Lane v. Clark County

Filing 82

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 81 defendant's motion be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

RANDEL LANE,

8
9
10

Case No. 2:11-CV-485 JCM (NJK)
Plaintiff(s),

ORDER

v.
CLARK COUNTY,

11

Defendant(s).

12
13

Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Randall Lane’s motion for this court to

14

reconsider its denial of plaintiff’s previous motion for review of Magistrate Judge Koppe’s order

15

striking six motions filed while plaintiff was represented by counsel. (ECF Nos. 56, 57, 80, 81).

16

Local Rule 7-3(b) states that “[a]ll [non-summary judgment] motions, responses to

17

motions, and pretrial and post-trial briefs are limited to 24 pages, excluding exhibits. All other

18

replies are limited to 12 pages, excluding exhibits.”

19
20

The instant motion is 32 pages long, excluding exhibits or declarations. (ECF No. 81).
Therefore, plaintiff is in violation of Local Rule 7-3(b).

21

Accordingly,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant’s motion

23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

(ECF No. 81) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
DATED April 20, 2017.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE