Moradi et al v. Adelson et al

Filing 85

ORDER that Defendants Motion to Enlarge Time #76 is GRANTED. Defendants will have fourteen (14) days from the date this Court renders a decision on the Motion to Dismiss #77 to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/4/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 NASSER MORADI, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. 6 SHELDON GARY ADELSON, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:11-cv-00490-GMN-RJJ (Base Case) CONSOLIDATED WITH 2:11-cv-00595-GMN-RJJ; and 2:11-cv-00636-GMN-RJJ ORDER 9 10 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Consolidated 11 Complaint until Disposition of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Stay (ECF No. 76). Plaintiffs 12 oppose any enlargement of time to file an answer to the Amended Complaint past the agreed upon 13 date of January 31, 2012. (See Order on Stipulation, ECF No. 81). 14 The Court finds that it would be appropriate to allow the enlargement of time in this 15 shareholder derivative suit because the ultimate costs associated with the filing of unnecessary 16 pleadings is bore by the shareholders. 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Enlarge Time (ECF No. 76) is 18 GRANTED. Defendants will have fourteen (14) days from the date this Court renders a decision 19 on the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 77) to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Amended 20 Complaint. 21 DATED this 4th day of January, 2012. 22 23 24 25 ________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?