Liguori et al v. Hansen et al

Filing 217

ORDER Granting 216 Stipulation for Continuance. Judgment Debtor Exam reset for 7/29/2015 at 10:00 AM at the law offices of Hutchison & Steffen. Motion Hearing re 212 Motion for Judgment reset for 7/29/2015 at 03:30 PM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
Case 2:11-cv-00492-GWF Document 216 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JEFFREY J. WHITEHEAD, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 3183 KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12594 BLACK & LOBELLO 10777 West Twain Avenue, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone Number: (702) 869-8801 Facsimile Number: (702) 869-2669 jwhitehead@blacklobellolaw.com khernandez@blacklobellolaw.com Attorneys for Defendant, Bert Hansen 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 STEVEN LIGUORI, an individual; and BRUNO LIGUORI TURQUOISE TRADING, INC., a Nevada Corporation, BLACK & LOBELLO 10777 West Twain Avenue, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 (702) 869-8801 FAX: (702) 869-2669 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, vs. BERT HANSEN, individually and doing business as the HOOVER DAM SNACKETERIA or the HIGH SCALER CAFÉ; KAWANA POHE, individually and doing business as the HOOVER DAM STORE; and DOES 1 through 10, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE FOR JUDGMENT DEBTOR EXAMINATION AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Defendants. 18 19 CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-00492-GWF Defendant Bert Hansen (“Hansen”), through his counsel of record, Jeffrey J. Whitehead, 20 Esq. and Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq. of BLACK & LOBELLO, and Plaintiffs Steven Liguori and 21 22 Bruno Liguori Turquoise Trading, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), through their counsel of record, Ava M. 23 Bessel, Esq., of HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, hereby stipulate to move the Judgment Debtor 24 Examination from July 21, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. to July 29th, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. at the law offices 25 of Hutchison & Steffen. The parties further stipulate to move the hearing on Hansen’s Motion 26 for Judgment (Doc. 212) from July 21st, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. to July 29th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m., LV 27 Courtroom 3A. 28 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:11-cv-00492-GWF Document 216 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 2 1 Therefore, the parties further stipulate and agree to move the Judgment Debtor 2 Examination to July 29, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. at the law offices of Hutchison & Steffen, and move 3 the hearing on Hansen’s Motion for Judgment (Doc. 212) from July 21st, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. to 4 July 29th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m., LV Courtroom 3A. 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED this 29th day of June, 2015. DATED this 29th day of June, 2015 BLACK & LOBELLO HUTCHISON & STEFFEN /s/ Jeffrey J. Whitehead /s/ Ava Bessel Jeffrey J. Whitehead, Esq. Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq. 10777 West Twain Avenue, 3rd Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Attorneys for Bert Hansen Todd L. Moody, Esq. Jacob A. Reynolds, Esq. Kumen L. Taylor, Esq. Ava Bessel, Esq. Peccole Professional Park 10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorney for Plaintiffs 11 BLACK & LOBELLO 10777 West Twain Avenue, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 (702) 869-8801 FAX: (702) 869-2669 12 13 ORDER 14 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Judgment Debtor Examination set for July 21, 2015 16 at 10:00 a.m. shall be rescheduled for July 29th, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. at the law offices of 17 Hutchison & Steffen. 18 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Hansen’s Motion for 19 Judgment (Doc. 212) set for July 21st, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. shall be rescheduled for July 29th, 2015 20 at 3:30 p.m., LV Courtroom 3A. 21 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 Respectfully Submitted by: 24 BLACK & LOBELLO 25 /s/ Jeffrey J. Whitehead 26 27 28 Dated: June 30, 2015 ______________________________ JEFFREY J. WHITEHEAD, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 3183 10777 W. Twain Ave., Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Attorneys for Bert Hansen Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?