Hollingsworth v. Clerk of the Court et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 NICHOLAS L. HOLLINGSWORTH, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 CLERK OF COURT, et al., 13 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:11-cv-00515-PMP-RJJ ORDER 14 15 This is a pro se civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, by an inmate 16 formerly incarcerated at the Henderson Detention Center. By order filed April 19, 2011, this Court 17 granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the complaint, allowing the 18 action to proceed. (ECF No. 2). The screening order was served on plaintiff at the Henderson 19 Detention Center, plaintiff’s address of record. (Id.). On April 21, 2011, the screening order was 20 returned to the Court as undeliverable – markings on the envelope indicate the following: “Non 21 Deliverable/Return To Sender/Not At This Address/No new address available.” (ECF No. 5). 22 Plaintiff has not notified the Court of a new address. 23 24 25 26 Rule LSR 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals provides: The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party or the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice. 1 In view of plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court informed of his address as required by LSR 2-2, the 2 Court will dismiss this action with prejudice. 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly. 5 6 DATED: July 6, 2011. 7 8 9 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?