Hollingsworth v. Clerk of the Court et al
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
NICHOLAS L. HOLLINGSWORTH,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
CLERK OF COURT, et al.,
13
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:11-cv-00515-PMP-RJJ
ORDER
14
15
This is a pro se civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, by an inmate
16
formerly incarcerated at the Henderson Detention Center. By order filed April 19, 2011, this Court
17
granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the complaint, allowing the
18
action to proceed. (ECF No. 2). The screening order was served on plaintiff at the Henderson
19
Detention Center, plaintiff’s address of record. (Id.). On April 21, 2011, the screening order was
20
returned to the Court as undeliverable – markings on the envelope indicate the following: “Non
21
Deliverable/Return To Sender/Not At This Address/No new address available.” (ECF No. 5).
22
Plaintiff has not notified the Court of a new address.
23
24
25
26
Rule LSR 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals provides:
The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification
of any change of address. The notification must include proof of
service upon each opposing party or the party’s attorney. Failure to
comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with
prejudice.
1
In view of plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court informed of his address as required by LSR 2-2, the
2
Court will dismiss this action with prejudice.
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly.
5
6
DATED: July 6, 2011.
7
8
9
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?