Combs v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
14
ORDER Denying without Prejudice 13 Motion for Trial Transcripts, Reinstating Case, Ordering Clerk to Electronically Serve 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Upon Respondents, Vacating 9 Order and 10 Judgment, and Setting Answer and Reply D eadlines. Attorney General for the State of Nevada and State of Nevada answer due 10/9/2011. Replies due 45 days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
BRETT COMBS,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
____________________________________/
2:11-cv-00528-PMP-LRL
ORDER
13
14
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which petitioner, a
15
state prisoner, is proceeding pro se. On June 10, 2011, the court issued an order granting petitioner’s
16
motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the petition without prejudice as wholly
17
unexhausted. (ECF No. 9.) When the court dismissed the petition, petitioner’s direct appeal to the
18
Nevada Supreme Court was still pending, and thus, his petition filed in this court was premature. At
19
the current juncture, however, it appears that petitioner’s direct appeal has concluded. Accordingly, in
20
the interests of justice, the court reopens this case.
21
Petitioner moves the court for copies of the trial transcripts from his criminal trial in case number
22
2:11-cr-00173-KJD-RJJ. Petitioner asserts that new evidence was presented in the federal criminal trial
23
that is relevant to this habeas corpus proceeding. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2250:
24
///
25
///
26
///
If on any application for a writ of habeas corpus an order has been made
permitting the petitioner to prosecute the application in forma pauperis, the
clerk of any court of the United States shall furnish to the petitioner
without cost certified copies of such documents or parts of the record on
file in his office as may be required by order of the judge before whom the
application is pending.
1
2
3
4
5
Thus, an indigent prisoner proceeding on a habeas corpus petition is entitled to receive copies of court
6
documents under 28 U.S.C. § 2250 at government expense. United States v. Connors, 904 F.2d 535,
7
536 (9th Cir. 1990). However, the matter of what, if any, copies should be provided to an indigent
8
habeas petitioner rests within the discretion of the judge presiding in the case. E.g., Chessman v. Teets,
9
239 F.2d 205, 214 (9th Cir. 1956), vacated on other grounds 354 U.S. 156 (1957). An indigent prisoner
10
seeking copies must set forth sufficient information to enable the court to determine the necessity for
11
the copies. See, e.g., United States v. Newsome, 257 F.Supp. 201, 203 (N.D. Ga. 1966). Blanket
12
requests for all copies in a case do not provide sufficient information for such an inquiry and are not
13
within the purview of the statute. See, e.g., id.; Cassidy v. United States, 304 F.Supp. 864, 867 (E.D.
14
Mo. 1969).
15
In this case, petitioner requests the trial transcripts from his three-day criminal trial in federal
16
court. Petitioner merely states that the trial transcripts are “associated” with his state-court proceedings
17
and that they provide new evidence. At this early stage of the case, without a more particularized
18
showing from petitioner, the court declines to find that the trial transcripts are necessary to this action
19
in order to have them produced at government expense. Petitioner may renew his request for specified
20
portions of the trial transcript if, after reviewing respondents’ response to his petition, he determines that
21
the transcripts are necessary to resolve the claims in the petition. In doing so, petitioner should specify
22
how the contents of the federal trial transcripts support the grounds contained in his habeas corpus
23
petition.
24
///
25
///
26
2
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is REINSTATED. The order dismissing
this case (ECF No. 9) and the judgment (ECF No. 10) are VACATED.
3
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for trial transcripts (ECF No. 13) is
DENIED without prejudice.
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the
6
petition (ECF No. 1) upon the respondents. A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all
7
claims for relief of which petitioner is aware. If petitioner fails to include such a claim in his
8
petition, he may be forever barred from seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C.
9
§2254(b) (successive petitions). If petitioner is aware of any claim not included in his petition, he
10
should notify the court of that as soon as possible, perhaps by means of a motion to amend his
11
petition to add the claim.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from entry
13
of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. In their answer or other
14
response, respondents shall address any claims presented by petitioner in his petition as well as any
15
claims presented by petitioner in any statement of additional claims. Respondents shall raise all
16
potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and
17
procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed,
18
respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the
19
United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have
20
forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
3
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon the Attorney
2
General of the State of Nevada a copy of every pleading, motion, or other document he submits for
3
consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a
4
certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the Attorney
5
General. The court may disregard any paper that does not include a certificate of service. After
6
respondents appear in this action, petitioner shall make such service upon the particular Deputy
7
Attorney General assigned to the case.
8
9
DATED: August 25, 2011.
10
11
12
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?