Caesars World, Inc. v. July et al
Filing
20
ORDER for Certificate of Interested Parties and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS ORDERED that counsel for Defendant Marcel shall have until 6/20/11 to fully comply with the provisions of Local Rule 7.1-1. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 6/20/2011. Defendant Octavius' show cause response/certificate of interested parties due by 6/20/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
CAESARS WORLD, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MARCEL JULY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:11-cv-00536-GMN-PAL
ORDER
and
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
13
14
This matter is before the court on Defendant Marcel July’s failure to file a Certificate as to
15
Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (Dkt. #1) in this matter was filed April 8,
16
2011. Defendant Marcel July’s Answer (Dkt. #15) was filed May 19, 2011. LR 7.1-1(a) requires,
17
unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for
18
private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ.
19
P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent
20
corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further
21
states that if there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement
22
to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental
23
certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, Defendant Marcel has
24
failed to comply.
25
This matter is also before the court on Defendant Octavius Tower, LLC’s (“Octavious”) failure
26
to comply with this court’s Order (Dkt. #13) requiring Defendant Octavius to file a Certificate as to
27
Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The court’s Order (Dkt. #13) entered May 18, 2011,
28
required Defendant Octavius to file its Certificate as to Interested Parties no later than 4:00 p.m., May
1
31, 2011, and further advised Defendant Octavius that its failure to timely comply with the court’s order
2
may result in sanctions. To date, Defendants Octavius has failed to comply with this court’s order.
3
The purpose of the certificate is to advise the court of all parties who may have an interest in the
4
outcome of the case so that the assigned judges may evaluate whether they have a conflict of interest
5
which requires recusal. Filing the certificate is a simple matter. Failing to comply with the Local Rules
6
of Practice, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the court’s orders may result in sanctions up to
7
and including case dispositive sanctions. If the Defendants know of no other parties who may have an
8
interest in the outcome of this case, a simple statement to that effect will suffice. Accordingly,
9
10
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant Marcel shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies
11
with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., June 20, 2011. Failure to comply may result in
12
the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
13
2.
Defendant Octavius shall show cause, in writing, no later than June 20, 2011, why
14
sanctions should not be imposed for its failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties
15
and its failure to comply with this court’s Order (Dkt. #13). Filing the Certificate of
16
Interested parties on or before June 20, 2011 will satisfy the court that sanctions are not
17
warranted, and no further response to this order to show cause shall be required.
18
Dated this 6th day of June, 2011.
19
20
21
______________________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?