Dunn v. Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, LLC et al

Filing 128

ORDER that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 100 is DENIED as moot. Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 101 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 6/25/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

***

10
VICTOR DUNN, et al.,
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ENDOSCOPY CENTER OF SOUTHERN
)
NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

Case No.: 2:11-cv-00560-MMD-PAL
ORDER
(Motion for Summary Judgment–#100;
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or,
in the Alternative, for Summary
Judgment–#101)

16
Before the Court are Defendants Baxter Healthcare Corp., McKesson Medical-

17
18

Surgical Inc., Sicor, Inc., and Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment

19

on Grounds of Federal Preemption (#100, filed Jan. 24, 2012) and the same Defendants Motion

20

for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment on State Law

21

Grounds (#101, filed Jan. 24, 2012). The Parties to this case, however, stipulated to the dismissal

22

of these Defendants and the Court signed the order dismissing these defendants on March 2, 2012.

23

Thus, the Court denies these Motions as moot.

24

/

25

/

26

/

AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)

1

1

Conclusion

2

Accordingly, and for good cause appearing,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

4
5
6
7

(#100) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings (#101) is DENIED as moot.
Dated: June 25, 2012.

8
9

____________________________________
ROGER L. HUNT
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)

2