Deneen v. Commissioner Of Social Security Adm.

Filing 28

ORDER Adopting 26 Report and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that 23 Motion for Reversal or, in the Alternative, Motion for Remand is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (contained within 24 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/14/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 KURTIS J. DENEEN, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 Case No. 2:11-cv-00573-MMD-CWH ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION – dkt. no. 26 v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States 17 Magistrate Judge (dkt. no. 26), entered by the Honorable C. W. Hoffman, Jr. regarding 18 Plaintiff Kurtis J. Deneen’s Motion for Reversal or In the Alternative Motion for Remand 19 (dkt. no. 23, filed January 13, 2012). 20 Hoffman’s Report and Recommendation in accordance with Local Rule LR IB 3-2 of the 21 Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. This 22 matter was referred to the undersigned for consideration. No objection was filed to Magistrate Judge 23 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in 24 accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that 25 the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hoffman should be accepted and 26 adopted in whole. 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (dkt. no. 26) is ADOPTED. 1 2 3 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal or In the Alternative Motion for Remand (dkt. no. 23) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. no. 24) is GRANTED. 5 6 ENTERED THIS 14th day of January 2013. 7 8 9 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?