Deneen v. Commissioner Of Social Security Adm.
Filing
28
ORDER Adopting 26 Report and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that 23 Motion for Reversal or, in the Alternative, Motion for Remand is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (contained within 24 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/14/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
KURTIS J. DENEEN,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
Case No. 2:11-cv-00573-MMD-CWH
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION – dkt. no. 26
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
13
Defendant.
14
15
16
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States
17
Magistrate Judge (dkt. no. 26), entered by the Honorable C. W. Hoffman, Jr. regarding
18
Plaintiff Kurtis J. Deneen’s Motion for Reversal or In the Alternative Motion for Remand
19
(dkt. no. 23, filed January 13, 2012).
20
Hoffman’s Report and Recommendation in accordance with Local Rule LR IB 3-2 of the
21
Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. This
22
matter was referred to the undersigned for consideration.
No objection was filed to Magistrate Judge
23
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in
24
accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that
25
the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hoffman should be accepted and
26
adopted in whole.
27
28
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (dkt. no. 26)
is ADOPTED.
1
2
3
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal or In the
Alternative Motion for Remand (dkt. no. 23) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment (dkt. no. 24) is GRANTED.
5
6
ENTERED THIS 14th day of January 2013.
7
8
9
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?