Tiffany (NJ), LLC v. 925ly.com et al
Filing
106
ORDER granting 100 Motion for Hearing. Status Conference set for 4/19/2012 at 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6B before Judge Lloyd D. George. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/10/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
David S. Kahn
Nevada Bar No. 007038
J. Scott Burris
Nevada Bar No. 010529
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101=
(702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401
E-mail:David.Kahn@wilsonelser.com
J.Scott.Burris@wilsonelser.com
Stephen M. Gaffigan (Pro Hac Vice)
STEPHEN M. GAFFIGAN, P.A.
401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 130-453
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Telephone: (954) 767-4819
Facsimile: (954) 767-4821
E-mail:stephen@smgpa.net
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff Tiffany (NJ), LLC
12
13
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
TIFFANY (NJ), LLC,
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
18
925LY.COM, et al.,
19
Defendants.
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case 2:11-cv-00590-LDG-GWF
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR STATUS
CONFERENCE
21
Plaintiff Tiffany (NJ), LLC (“Tiffany” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned counsel
22
hereby respectfully requests a status conference be held in the above-captioned matter and, as good
23
cause therefor, states as follows:
24
On November 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed its Third Ex Parte Application for Entry of Temporary
25
Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (“Third Application for TRO” (D.E. 76)) which
26
remains pending before the Court.
27
On December 20, 2011 (D.E. 77), Plaintiff filed a Motion for Entry of Clerk’s Default with
28
1
_________________________________________________________________________________
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
Case 2:11-cv-00590-LDG -CWH Document 100
Filed 04/05/12 Page 2 of 2
1
respect to Defendants 1, 3, 4-7, 9-10, 13, 15-19, 21-22, 24, 26-28, 30-31, 33-34, 36-37, 40-42, 45-50,
2
52-54, 56-64, 66-71, 73-74, 76-80, 82-88, 90-92, 96-98, 100, 102, 106-108, 110, 116-120, 122-126,
3
128-130, 135-139, 142, 145-150, 153, 155-156, 158, 160-161, 163-164, 166-168, 170-173, 175, 178-
4
181, 183-184, 188-189, 192-194, 196-197, 200, 202, 206, 209-214, 216-218, and 220-223.
As per the Court’s request, on December 29, 2011 (D.E. 78) and January 13, 2012 (D.E. 86),
5
6
respectively, Plaintiff filed briefs addressing service of process and personal jurisdiction.
Many of the websites which are the subject of Plaintiff’s pending Third Application for TRO
7
8
are
9
operational domains which are the subject of the Third Application for TRO are continuing to cause
10
irreparable harm to Plaintiff with each passing day. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests the
11
Court hold a status conference to allow Plaintiff to address any ongoing concerns of the Court
12
regarding service of process and personal jurisdiction.
13
still up and running and some are reaching potential expiration and transfer dates.
The
WHEREFORE Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court hold a status conference in this
14
matter at the Court’s earliest convenience.
15
DATED: April __, 2012
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ David S. Kahn _______________
David S. Kahn
J. Scott Burris
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
ORDER
(702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401
David.Kahn@wilsonelser.com
IT IS SO ORDERED a status conference J.Scott.Burris@wilsonelser.com
in the above matter is scheduled on Thursday
April 19, 2012, at 9:00 AM in Crtrm. 6B. Of Counsel:
Stephen M. Gaffigan (Pro Hac Vice)
STEPHEN M. GAFFIGAN, P.A.
DATED this ____ day of April, 2012.
401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 130-453
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Telephone: (954) 767-4819
Facsimile: (954) 767-4821
________________________
stephen@smgpa.net
Lloyd D. George
Sr. U.S. District Judge
28
2
_________________________________________________________________________________
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?