Tiffany (NJ), LLC v. 925ly.com et al

Filing 106

ORDER granting 100 Motion for Hearing. Status Conference set for 4/19/2012 at 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6B before Judge Lloyd D. George. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/10/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 David S. Kahn Nevada Bar No. 007038 J. Scott Burris Nevada Bar No. 010529 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, NV 89101= (702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401 E-mail:David.Kahn@wilsonelser.com J.Scott.Burris@wilsonelser.com Stephen M. Gaffigan (Pro Hac Vice) STEPHEN M. GAFFIGAN, P.A. 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 130-453 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 767-4819 Facsimile: (954) 767-4821 E-mail:stephen@smgpa.net 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Tiffany (NJ), LLC 12 13 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 TIFFANY (NJ), LLC, 16 17 Plaintiff, v. 18 925LY.COM, et al., 19 Defendants. 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 2:11-cv-00590-LDG-GWF PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE 21 Plaintiff Tiffany (NJ), LLC (“Tiffany” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned counsel 22 hereby respectfully requests a status conference be held in the above-captioned matter and, as good 23 cause therefor, states as follows: 24 On November 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed its Third Ex Parte Application for Entry of Temporary 25 Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (“Third Application for TRO” (D.E. 76)) which 26 remains pending before the Court. 27 On December 20, 2011 (D.E. 77), Plaintiff filed a Motion for Entry of Clerk’s Default with 28 1 _________________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE Case 2:11-cv-00590-LDG -CWH Document 100 Filed 04/05/12 Page 2 of 2 1 respect to Defendants 1, 3, 4-7, 9-10, 13, 15-19, 21-22, 24, 26-28, 30-31, 33-34, 36-37, 40-42, 45-50, 2 52-54, 56-64, 66-71, 73-74, 76-80, 82-88, 90-92, 96-98, 100, 102, 106-108, 110, 116-120, 122-126, 3 128-130, 135-139, 142, 145-150, 153, 155-156, 158, 160-161, 163-164, 166-168, 170-173, 175, 178- 4 181, 183-184, 188-189, 192-194, 196-197, 200, 202, 206, 209-214, 216-218, and 220-223. As per the Court’s request, on December 29, 2011 (D.E. 78) and January 13, 2012 (D.E. 86), 5 6 respectively, Plaintiff filed briefs addressing service of process and personal jurisdiction. Many of the websites which are the subject of Plaintiff’s pending Third Application for TRO 7 8 are 9 operational domains which are the subject of the Third Application for TRO are continuing to cause 10 irreparable harm to Plaintiff with each passing day. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests the 11 Court hold a status conference to allow Plaintiff to address any ongoing concerns of the Court 12 regarding service of process and personal jurisdiction. 13 still up and running and some are reaching potential expiration and transfer dates. The WHEREFORE Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court hold a status conference in this 14 matter at the Court’s earliest convenience. 15 DATED: April __, 2012 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ David S. Kahn _______________ David S. Kahn J. Scott Burris WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, NV 89101 ORDER (702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401 David.Kahn@wilsonelser.com IT IS SO ORDERED a status conference J.Scott.Burris@wilsonelser.com in the above matter is scheduled on Thursday April 19, 2012, at 9:00 AM in Crtrm. 6B. Of Counsel: Stephen M. Gaffigan (Pro Hac Vice) STEPHEN M. GAFFIGAN, P.A. DATED this ____ day of April, 2012. 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 130-453 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 767-4819 Facsimile: (954) 767-4821 ________________________ stephen@smgpa.net Lloyd D. George Sr. U.S. District Judge 28 2 _________________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?