Rudin v. Myles et al

Filing 78

ORDER Granting 77 Motion for Enlargement of Time. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

M. Greg Mullanax, SBN 155138
[e-mail]
Law Office of M. Greg Mullanax
2140 N. Winery Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93703
[phone]
[phone] fax
Attorney for Petitioner,
Margaret Rudin

7

U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T

8

D I S T R I C T O F N E V AD A

9

Margaret Rudin,

10

Case No. 2:11-CV-00643-RFB-GWF
Petitioner,

11
12

Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time
(First Request)

v.
Carolyn Myles, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14

Petitioner, by and through counsel, M. Greg Mullanax, hereby respectfully move this court for an

15
16

order granting a thirty (30) day enlargement of time, to and including February 1, 2017, in which to file

17

and serve her reply to the State’s answer to her amended petition.
This motion is based upon the provisions of Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

18
19

the attached Declaration of Counsel, as well as all other papers, documents, records, pleadings and other

20

materials on file herein.

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
Page 1

1
2

This is the first request for an enlargement with respect to the reply to the State’s answer to
Rudin’s first amended petition. This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

3
4

Respectfully submitted,

5
6

Dated:

December 19, 2016

LAW OFFICE OF M. GREG MULLANAX

7
By:

8
9
10

/s/ M. Greg Mullanax
M. Greg Mullanax
Attorney for Petitioner,
Margaret Rudin

11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd

day of

January, 2017.
d

, 2016.

15
16
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

M. Greg Mullanax, SBN 155138
[e-mail]
Law Office of M. Greg Mullanax
2140 N. Winery Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93703
[phone]
[phone] fax
Attorney for Petitioner,
Margaret Rudin

7
8

U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T

9

D I S T R I C T O F N E V AD A

10

Margaret Rudin,

11

Case No. 2:11-CV-00643-RFB-GWF
Petitioner,

12

v.

13

Declaration of Counsel

Carolyn Myles, et al.,

14

Respondents.

15
16
17

I, M. Greg Mullanax, declare under penalty of perjury:

18

1.

19
20

I am petitioner Margaret Rudin’s attorney, and I make this declaration on behalf of

Petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time in the above-captioned matter.
2.

By this motion, I am requesting an enlargement of thirty (30) days, to and including

21

February 1, 2017, to file a response to the State’s answer to petitioner’s amended petition. This is my first

22

request for an enlargement of time with respect to the reply to the State’s answer.

23

3.

Since the State filed its answer after two extensions of time, petitioner’s reply is due right

24

after the holiday season, which would require me to change my plans in order to comply with a deadline of

25

January 2, 2017.

26
27

4.

I communicated with opposing counsel, Jeffrey M. Conner. He indicated that he has no

opposition to the request for additional time.

28
Page 3

1
2

5.

This motion for enlargement of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of

unduly delaying the ultimate disposition of this case.

3
4

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

5
6

/s/ M. Greg Mullanax
M. Greg Mullanax

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 4