Barren v. Roger et al

Filing 87

ORDER Overruling and Denying 82 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order re 79 Order on Motion to Compel. Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Order 79 is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

***

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

GREGORY D. BARREN, SR.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DAVID ROGER, OFFICER T. ROBINSON; )
OFFICER R. KENT; OFFICER D. SHANE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

Case No.: 2:11-cv-650-RLH-CWH
ORDER
(Motion for District Judge to Reconsider
Order– #82)

17
Before the Court is Plaintiff Gregory D. Barren, Sr.’s Motion for District Judge to
18
Reconsider Order (#82, April 30, 2014 ). Plaintiff appeals an Order entered by the Honorable Carl
19
Hoffman, (#79, April 24, 2014), denying Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (#61, Mar. 25, 2014).
20
Plaintiff filed his Objection to Judge Hoffman’s Order in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-1 of the
21
Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Defendants Terry
22
Robinson, Raymon Kent, and Donald Shane’s (collectively “Officers”) did not file a response, and
23
as LR IB 3-1 does not provide for a reply, this matter was referred for consideration.
24
25
26
AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)

1

1

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance

2

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Order

3

of Magistrate Judge Hoffman is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed.

4

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hoffman’s Order (#79) is

5
6

AFFIRMED, Plaintiff’s Objections are overruled, and Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.
Dated: May 19, 2014.

7
8

____________________________________
ROGER L. HUNT
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)

2