Martin v. Metro Police Department et al
Filing
10
ORDER Adopting and Affirming 5 Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Complaint. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
COLLIS MARTIN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
JOHN DOE, et al.,
14
Case No. 2:11-CV-00658-KJD-CWH
Defendants.
ORDER
15
16
Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 10, 2011, Magistrate
17
Judge George W. Foley issued an Order and Findings and Recommendations (#5) recommending
18
that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice because the Court does not have jurisdiction to
19
hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court. Objections to the findings and recommendation
20
were due no later than August 27, 2011. More than the allotted time has elapsed and Plaintiff has not
21
filed objections. Accordingly, this entire action will be dismissed because the Court does not have
22
jurisdiction to hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court.
23
Furthermore, Court mail addressed to Plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable.
24
Accordingly, even if the Court were not dismissing the action for lack of jurisdiction, the Court
25
would dismiss the complaint against defendants without prejudice in accordance with Local Special
26
Rule 2-2 for Plaintiff’s failure to update his current address.
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order and Findings and
2
Recommendations (#5) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered August 10, 2011, are
3
ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
4
5
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED because the
Court does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court.
DATED this 3rd day of October 2011.
7
8
9
10
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?