Martin v. Metro Police Department et al

Filing 10

ORDER Adopting and Affirming 5 Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Complaint. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 COLLIS MARTIN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 JOHN DOE, et al., 14 Case No. 2:11-CV-00658-KJD-CWH Defendants. ORDER 15 16 Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 10, 2011, Magistrate 17 Judge George W. Foley issued an Order and Findings and Recommendations (#5) recommending 18 that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice because the Court does not have jurisdiction to 19 hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court. Objections to the findings and recommendation 20 were due no later than August 27, 2011. More than the allotted time has elapsed and Plaintiff has not 21 filed objections. Accordingly, this entire action will be dismissed because the Court does not have 22 jurisdiction to hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court. 23 Furthermore, Court mail addressed to Plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable. 24 Accordingly, even if the Court were not dismissing the action for lack of jurisdiction, the Court 25 would dismiss the complaint against defendants without prejudice in accordance with Local Special 26 Rule 2-2 for Plaintiff’s failure to update his current address. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order and Findings and 2 Recommendations (#5) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered August 10, 2011, are 3 ADOPTED and AFFIRMED; 4 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED because the Court does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals from the rulings of a state trial court. DATED this 3rd day of October 2011. 7 8 9 10 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?