Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Health and Welfare Trust v. P&P Insurance Services, LLC et al

Filing 31

ORDER Granting 25 First Motion to Expedite Discovery and to Enlarge Time to Serve; Granting 29 Motion to Extend Time to serve defendants GIS, Michael Johnson, and Peter Rancke. Plaintiff shall have a 90 day extension to effect service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/15/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) P&P INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:11-cv-00734-RCJ-PAL ORDER (Mot Expedite Discovery - Dkt. #25) (Request to Enlarge Time - Dkt. #29) 13 14 Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Expedited Discovery (Dkt. #25), and to Enlarge Time 15 to Serve (Dkt. #29), which were filed as one document, but docketed as two separate motions because 16 they request two separate forms of relief. 17 Plaintiff requests an order allowing expedited discovery, specifically, to allow the Plaintiff Las 18 Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Health and Welfare Trust (“the Metro Trust”) to subpoena the 19 ownership records of the post office box of GIS in Phoenix, Arizona, prior to the Rule 26(f) conference. 20 Plaintiff also seeks an order enlarging time to serve Defendants GIS, and individual Defendants 21 Michael Johnson and Peter Ranke. The Complaint (Dkt. #1) in this case was filed May 9, 2011. 22 Summons were issued and Defendants P&P Insurance Services, LLC and Tom Pomeroy filed a Motion 23 to Dismiss (Dkt. #19) July 15, 2011. Defendant Tru Services, LLC filed an Answer/Crossclaim/Third- 24 Party Complaint (Dkt. #20) June 27, 2011. The current motion, which is supported by the declaration 25 of counsel for the Plaintiff indicates she has spoken with counsel for Defendants P&P, Pomeroy, and 26 True Services, LLC, and advised them of her intention to file this motion, and received no objections. 27 Expedited review is requested because the deadline to serve Defendants GIS, Johnson and/or Ranke 28 will expire if the court allows the ordinary briefing period to expire before deciding the motion. 1 The Plaintiff argues good cause exists to allow limited expedited discovery because the Plaintiff 2 has been unable to locate Defendants GIS, Johnson and Ranke, and must subpoena the records for a 3 post office box in Arizona which is believed to be owned by GIS. Good cause exists to enlarge time to 4 serve these Defendants because the Plaintiff has been unable to locate and serve the Defendants despite 5 the exercise of diligence. 6 Having reviewed and considered the matter, and for good cause shown, 7 IT IS ORDERED that: 8 1. 9 10 Plaintiff’s Motion for Expedited Discovery (Dkt. #25), to subpoena records of the post office box of GIS located in Phoenix, Arizona is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s Request to Enlarge Time to Serve Defendants GIS, Johnson and Rancke (Dkt. 11 #29) is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff shall have a 90-day extension to effect service 12 upon GIS, Michael Johnson and Peter Ranke. 13 Dated this 15th day of August, 2011. 14 15 16 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?