Cooper et al v. Ningbo Xingqiang Metallic Products Co. Ltd.
Filing
33
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Reopen Case. Show Cause Hearing set for 7/19/2012 at 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6C before Judge Roger L. Hunt to show cause why Defendant should not be held in contempt. Service of this Order be made on Defendant or its attorneys in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, on or before 7/8/12 at 5:00 PM. Defendants affidavits in opposition to the Motion for Order to Show Cause Regarding Contempt be served on Plaintiffs attorney by hand delivery or by sending them by Feder al express or email so that they are received by Plaintiffs attorney by 7/6/12 at 4:00 PM. Plaintiffs shall serve any additional brief by hand delivery or by sending them by Federal express or email so that they are received by Defendant or its attorney by 7/13/12 at 4:00 PM. Case reopened. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
L. CHRISTOPHER ROSE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7500
Email: lcr@juww.com
TYLER N. URE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11730
Email: tnu@juww.com
JOLLEY URGA WIRTH WOODBURY & STANDISH
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., #1600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone:
(702) 699-7500
Facsimile:
(702) 699-7555
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sandy Cooper
and Garden Meadow, Inc.
8
UNITED SATES DISTRICT COURT
Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish
3800 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAY, SUITE 1600, LAS VEGAS, NV 89169
TELEPHONE: (702) 699-7500 FAX: (702) 699-7555
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
SANDY COOPER, an individual, GARDEN
MEADOW, INC., a Connecticut corporation,
CASE NO.
2:11-cv-00745-RLH-GWF
12
[PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REOPEN AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE REGARDING CONTEMPT
Plaintiffs,
13
14
vs.
15
NINGBO XINGQIANG METALLIC
PRODUCTS CO., LTD., a Chinese company,
16
17
Defendants.
18
Plaintiffs Sandy Cooper and Garden Meadow, Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Reopen and
19
For Order to Show Cause [Doc. 7] and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Order to Show
20
Cause Regarding Contempt [Doc. 8] having come before this Court, the Court having considered
21
the moving papers and declaration in support thereof, and for good cause shown;
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen is GRANTED and case
23
no. 2:11-cv-00745-RLH-GWF shall be reopened for the further hearings regarding whether
24
Defendant violated the permanent injunction previously issued in this matter [Doc. 24];
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant appear before the Court at Courtroom
26
6C
_____, United States Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas, Blvd. South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 at
27
28
Page 1 of 2
K:\LCR\Garden Meadow 11531\General 26000\Pleadings\Drafts\12-04-27 Order Motion to Reopen and OSC.doc
1
July 19, 2012
9:00 am
________ on _________________, or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, to show cause
2
why Defendant should not be held in contemptl
3
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Service of this Order be made on Defendant or its
July 8, 2012
attorneys in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, on or before _______________, at 5:00 P.M;
Order to Show Cause Regarding Contempt be served on Plaintiffs’ attorney by hand delivery or
7
by sending them by Federal express or email so that they are received by Plaintiff’s attorney by
8
July 6, 2012
_____________ at 4:00 P.M. Plaintiffs shall serve any additional brief by hand delivery or by
9
Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s affidavits in opposition to the Motion for
6
3800 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAY, SUITE 1600, LAS VEGAS, NV 89169
TELEPHONE: (702) 699-7500 FAX: (702) 699-7555
5
sending them by Federal express or email so that they are received by Defendant or its attorney
10
11
July 13, 2012
by _____________ at 4:00 P.M.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
May 30, 2012
DATED:____________________________
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
K:\LCR\Garden Meadow 11531\General 26000\Pleadings\Drafts\12-04-27 Order Motion to Reopen and OSC.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?