Cooper et al v. Ningbo Xingqiang Metallic Products Co. Ltd.

Filing 33

ORDER granting 29 Motion to Reopen Case. Show Cause Hearing set for 7/19/2012 at 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6C before Judge Roger L. Hunt to show cause why Defendant should not be held in contempt. Service of this Order be made on Defendant or its attorneys in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, on or before 7/8/12 at 5:00 PM. Defendants affidavits in opposition to the Motion for Order to Show Cause Regarding Contempt be served on Plaintiffs attorney by hand delivery or by sending them by Feder al express or email so that they are received by Plaintiffs attorney by 7/6/12 at 4:00 PM. Plaintiffs shall serve any additional brief by hand delivery or by sending them by Federal express or email so that they are received by Defendant or its attorney by 7/13/12 at 4:00 PM. Case reopened. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L. CHRISTOPHER ROSE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7500 Email: lcr@juww.com TYLER N. URE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11730 Email: tnu@juww.com JOLLEY URGA WIRTH WOODBURY & STANDISH 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., #1600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 699-7500 Facsimile: (702) 699-7555 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sandy Cooper and Garden Meadow, Inc. 8 UNITED SATES DISTRICT COURT Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish 3800 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAY, SUITE 1600, LAS VEGAS, NV 89169 TELEPHONE: (702) 699-7500 FAX: (702) 699-7555 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 SANDY COOPER, an individual, GARDEN MEADOW, INC., a Connecticut corporation, CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00745-RLH-GWF 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REOPEN AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING CONTEMPT Plaintiffs, 13 14 vs. 15 NINGBO XINGQIANG METALLIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD., a Chinese company, 16 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs Sandy Cooper and Garden Meadow, Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Reopen and 19 For Order to Show Cause [Doc. 7] and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Order to Show 20 Cause Regarding Contempt [Doc. 8] having come before this Court, the Court having considered 21 the moving papers and declaration in support thereof, and for good cause shown; 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen is GRANTED and case 23 no. 2:11-cv-00745-RLH-GWF shall be reopened for the further hearings regarding whether 24 Defendant violated the permanent injunction previously issued in this matter [Doc. 24]; 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant appear before the Court at Courtroom 26 6C _____, United States Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas, Blvd. South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 at 27 28 Page 1 of 2 K:\LCR\Garden Meadow 11531\General 26000\Pleadings\Drafts\12-04-27 Order Motion to Reopen and OSC.doc 1 July 19, 2012 9:00 am ________ on _________________, or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, to show cause 2 why Defendant should not be held in contemptl 3 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Service of this Order be made on Defendant or its July 8, 2012 attorneys in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, on or before _______________, at 5:00 P.M; Order to Show Cause Regarding Contempt be served on Plaintiffs’ attorney by hand delivery or 7 by sending them by Federal express or email so that they are received by Plaintiff’s attorney by 8 July 6, 2012 _____________ at 4:00 P.M. Plaintiffs shall serve any additional brief by hand delivery or by 9 Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s affidavits in opposition to the Motion for 6 3800 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAY, SUITE 1600, LAS VEGAS, NV 89169 TELEPHONE: (702) 699-7500 FAX: (702) 699-7555 5 sending them by Federal express or email so that they are received by Defendant or its attorney 10 11 July 13, 2012 by _____________ at 4:00 P.M. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 May 30, 2012 DATED:____________________________ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2 K:\LCR\Garden Meadow 11531\General 26000\Pleadings\Drafts\12-04-27 Order Motion to Reopen and OSC.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?