Adamson v. Amati et al
ORDER denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 87 Rule 60(b) Motion. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
GREGORY K. ADAMSON,
Case No. 2:11-cv-00781-MMD-CWH
AMATI, et al.,
On March 22, 2016, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice based on
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended proof
of service on certain defendants. (ECF No. 79.) Plaintiff appealed. (ECF No. 80.) On
August 25, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Plaintiff’s appeal for
failure perfect his appeal. (ECF No. 85.) About seven months later, on March 24, 2017,
Plaintiff filed a Rule 60(b) motion, contending that he seeks protection of the judgment
based on alleged fraud by the Court. (ECF No. 87.) Plaintiff’s motion is frivolous. The
Court dismissed this action because of Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the deadline
established by the Court despite repeated extensions of time. Plaintiff fails to offer a valid
reason for the Court to grant him relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b). Plaintiff’s
Rule 60(b) motion (ECF No. 87) is therefore denied.
DATED THIS 19th day of April 2017.
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?