Wear et al v. Sprint Communications Company L.P. et al
Filing
17
ORDER that Arthur T. Susman, Charles R. Watkins and John R. Wylie shall register with CM/ECF and a Notice of Compliance with Special Order 109 shall be completed and filed no later than five (5) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/7/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ELIZABETH WEAR and JOHN BUTCHER,
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly-situated,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
)
L.P., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:11-cv-00809-KJD-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the 2nd Notice of Violation of Special Order 109 (#15)
15
on March 5, 2012, addressed to Plaintiffs’ counsel Arthur T. Susman, Charles R. Watkins and John
16
R. Wylie. Section 1.B. of the Courts’ Electronic Filing Procedures (enacted pursuant to Special
17
Order 109) states, in part, “Attorneys who are admitted to the bar of this court, admitted to
18
participate in a case pro hac vice, or who are authorized to represent the United States and its
19
agencies, shall register as Filing Users of the System”. To date, Arthur T. Susman, Charles R.
20
Watkins and John R. Wylie have not complied. Accordingly,
21
IT IS ORDERED that Arthur T. Susman, Charles R. Watkins and John R. Wylie shall
22
register with CM/ECF and a “Notice of Compliance with Special Order 109” shall be completed
23
and filed no later than five (5) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply may result in the
24
issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
25
DATED this 7th day of March, 2012.
26
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?