Kadmiri v. Rich et al
Filing
7
ORDER Denying 6 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 9/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
10
11
12
13
JOEY KADMIRI,
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
JASON RICH,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:11-cv-857-RLH-PAL
ORDER
(Motion for Default Judgment–#6)
14
15
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgement (#6, filed September 7,
16
2011). Inasmuch as the motion is totally without merit, and the Defendant has not been properly
17
served, the Court will not await a response.
18
Attached to the Motion is what Plaintiff claims is a “Summons–Proof of Service.”
19
What the document actually is an INMATE MONEY RELEASE form of the Las Vegas Metropolitan
20
Police Department, on which Plaintiff has written the words, “Summons-Proof of Service.” The
21
document is neither a summons nor proof of service.
22
Even had there been an appropriate summons and complaint served upon (not mailed
23
to) the Defendant Jason Rich, according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the first step would
24
be a request for entry of default and then, once that was entered, and appropriate motion, supported by
25
affidavits and evidence to establish that a default judgment should be entered. The document attached
26
to the Motion as Exhibit A does none of that.
1
1
2
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgement (#6) is
DENIED.
Dated: September 12, 2011.
4
5
____________________________________
Roger L. Hunt
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?