Paulus v. US Department of Education et al

Filing 21

ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond. US Department of Education answer due 2/29/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
Nevada State Bar No. 2137
CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
Assistant United States Attorney
333 Las Vegas Blvd. So., #5000
Las Vegas, Nevada
89101
Ph: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for the United States.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

MR. FRANKLIN PAULUS,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, et al.,

14
Defendants.
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.2:11-cv-00903-GMN-VCF
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(First Request)

COMES NOW Defendant, United States Department of Education,

16
17

by and through Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney for the

18

District of Nevada, and Carlos A. Gonzalez, Assistant United

19

States Attorney, and respectfully moves for a thirty (30) day

20

extension of time to and including February 29, 2012, in which to

21

file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

22

...

23

...

24

...

25

...

26

...

1

In support of this request for an extension of time,

2

Defendants rely upon the Memorandum of Points and Authorities set

3

forth below.

4

DATED this 30TH day of January 2012.

5

Respectfully submitted,

6

DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney

7
8

/s/ CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
Carlos A. Gonzalez
Assistant United States Attorney

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2

1
2

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
I.

3

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed his complaint on or around June 6, 2011.

4

The summons and complaint were served on the United States

5

Attorney’s Office on November 29, 2011.

6

The due date for the Defendant of Education filing of a

7

responsive pleading is January 30, 2011.

8

II.

9
10

ARGUMENT
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for an

enlargement of time for cause shown.

11

When an act may or must be done within a specified
time, the court may, for good cause, extend the
time . . . if a request is made, before the original
time or its extension expires . . . .

12
13

Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 6(b).
14
15
16

This request is made prior to the expiration of time
permitted to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

17

Presently, the Department of Education’s responsive

18

pleading to the complaint is near completion.

19

the exhibits needed to document defendants assertions are in the

20

process of being redacted and forwarded to undersigned counsel

21

for its inclusion in the defendant’s responsive pleading.

22

...

23

...

24

...

25

...

26

...
3

However, some of

1

III.

CONCLUSION

2

Therefore, the Defendant respectfully request that this

3
4

honorable Court grant an additional thirty (30) day extension of
2012
time, up to and including February 29, 2011, to respond to

5

Plaintiff’s Complaint.

6
7
8
9
10

DATED this 30th day of January 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
Daniel G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
//S/ CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
Assistant United States Attorney

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED:

13
14
______________________________
15
16

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1-31-12
DATE: ______________________

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4