Schmidt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER Denying 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8

DAVID SCHMIDT,

9

Plaintiff,
10

vs.
11

C.R. BARD, INC., et al.,
12

Defendants.

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-CV-00978-PMP-PAL
ORDER

14
15

Before the Court for consideration is Defendants’ fully briefed Motion for

16

Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #37) file

17

January 27, 2012.
Because the Court finds genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether

18
19

Plaintiff knew, or should have discovered the facts giving rise to his claims in this case,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #37) is

20
21

DENIED.

22

DATED: March 5, 2012.

23
24
25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge