Rencher v. State Of Nevada et al

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 10 Motion for Relief from Order #9 pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). The court clarifies that if the parties are unable to settle during the ninety-day stay, no filing fee will be due in this removed action. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 EDDIE RENCHER, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) STATE OF NEVADA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:11-cv-01040-RCJ-GWF ORDER 13 14 Plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint in state court, which defendants removed. Before 15 the court is plaintiff’s “motion for relief from order” (docket #10). In his motion, plaintiff points out 16 that the Order regarding informal settlement discussions (docket #10) incorrectly refers to the $350 17 filing fee. Accordingly, the court clarifies that even if the parties do not settle during the ninety-day 18 stay, no filing fee will be due in this removed action. 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for relief from order (docket 20 #10) is GRANTED. The court clarifies that if the parties are unable to settle during the ninety-day 21 stay, no filing fee will be due in this removed action. 22 DATED: August 8, 2011. 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?