Lacombe v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation dba Glaxosmithkline

Filing 11

Not Certified CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-104). Signed by MDL Panel on 7/19/11. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Minute Order)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Case MDL No. 1871 Document 667 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

MDL No. 1871

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO−104)

On October 16, 2007, the Panel transferred 2 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §1407. See 528 F.Supp.2d 1339 (J.P.M.L. 2007). Since that time, 1,619 additional
action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that
court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M Rufe.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and assigned to
Judge Rufe.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of October 16, 2007, and, with
the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M Rufe.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk
shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk
of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel

Jul 19, 2011

Case MDL No. 1871 Document 667 Filed 07/19/11 Page 2 of 3

IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

MDL No. 1871

SCHEDULE CTO−104 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST

DIV.

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DC

1

11−01111

FASULO v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC

FLORIDA NORTHERN
FLN

4

10−00551

HENDERSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
CORPORATION

FLORIDA SOUTHERN
FLS

9

10−81581

Lawrimore et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation

ILLINOIS SOUTHERN
ILS

3

11−00471

Adcock et al vs. GlaxoSmithKline LLC

Opposed 7/18/11

KENTUCKY WESTERN
KYW

3

10−00721

Plappert v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al

LOUISIANA MIDDLE
LAM

3

11−00439

Hebert et al v. GlaxoSmithKline

11−01569
11−01570
11−01571
11−01734
11−01738
11−01741
11−01742

Wang v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Hawhee v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
McKinney v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Schoenheide v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cataldi v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Stephan v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Kennedy v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al

MINNESOTA
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
NEVADA

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Case MDL No. 1871 Document 667 Filed 07/19/11 Page 3 of 3

NV

2

11−01093

Lacombe v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation dba
Glaxosmithkline