Hatlen v. Felleps et al
Filing
19
ORDER Denying 16 Motion to Reassign Case. Denying 17 Motion to have the matterreassigned to a different judge. Denying 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk shall not accept any other documents for filing in this matter except a proper Notice of Appeal. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
KENNETH HATLEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
Case No. 2:11-cv-01117-KJD-CWH
LT. FELLEPS,
15
ORDER
Defendant.
16
This was a pro se prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. The court
17
18
granted petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff paid the required initial
19
installment. Thereafter, plaintiff moved to amend the complaint by way of a supplement, which the
20
court denied, directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint which was complete within itself.
21
(ECF No. 10). That order was returned to the court as undeliverable. The complaint was dismissed
22
and the action closed on September 14, 2011 because plaintiff failed to keep the court informed of
23
his address and because he failed to file a viable complaint despite being given ample opportunity to
24
do so.
25
Now, plaintiff has filed various motions including a motion for appointment of
26
counsel (ECF No. 18), a motion to receive free copies (ECF No. 17) and a motion to have the matter
27
reassigned to a different judge (ECF No. 16). The motion will be denied without further
28
1
consideration because the matter has been dismissed. The Clerk shall not accept any other
2
documents for filing in this matter except a proper Notice of Appeal.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: December 5, 2011
5
6
________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?