Hatlen v. Felleps et al

Filing 19

ORDER Denying 16 Motion to Reassign Case. Denying 17 Motion to have the matterreassigned to a different judge. Denying 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk shall not accept any other documents for filing in this matter except a proper Notice of Appeal. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 KENNETH HATLEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 Case No. 2:11-cv-01117-KJD-CWH LT. FELLEPS, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 This was a pro se prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. The court 17 18 granted petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff paid the required initial 19 installment. Thereafter, plaintiff moved to amend the complaint by way of a supplement, which the 20 court denied, directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint which was complete within itself. 21 (ECF No. 10). That order was returned to the court as undeliverable. The complaint was dismissed 22 and the action closed on September 14, 2011 because plaintiff failed to keep the court informed of 23 his address and because he failed to file a viable complaint despite being given ample opportunity to 24 do so. 25 Now, plaintiff has filed various motions including a motion for appointment of 26 counsel (ECF No. 18), a motion to receive free copies (ECF No. 17) and a motion to have the matter 27 reassigned to a different judge (ECF No. 16). The motion will be denied without further 28 1 consideration because the matter has been dismissed. The Clerk shall not accept any other 2 documents for filing in this matter except a proper Notice of Appeal. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: December 5, 2011 5 6 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?