Acosta v. Lovelock Correctional Center et al

Filing 18

ORDER that plaintiffs motion for copies 14 and motion for transcripts 15 are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11
12

ARTURO E. ACOSTA,

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15

LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, et al.,

16
Defendants.
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/

2:11-cv-01125-JCM-CWH
ORDER

18
This closed action was a pro se complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, by a Nevada
19
state prisoner. By order filed November 4, 2011, this Court dismissed the action with prejudice, in
20
its entirety. (ECF No. 8). Judgment was entered the same date. (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff filed a notice
21
of appeal. (ECF No. 11). By order filed March 12, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the
22
Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and denied all pending motions. (ECF
23
No. 17).
24
On February 22, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for copies of all exhibits and a motion for
25
transcripts at government expense. (ECF Nos. 14 & 15). Because plaintiff’s case has concluded in
26
this court and in the court of appeals, the motions for copies and transcripts are denied as moot.

1
2
3

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for copies (ECF No. 14) and
motion for transcripts (ECF No. 15) are DENIED AS MOOT.
15th
Dated this ______ day of March, 2012.

4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2