Blanchard v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al

Filing 59

ORDER that 54 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order is NOT APPROVED and is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 55 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED AS MOOT. The parties shall file a proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling o rder no later than 30 days after the ruling on Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation's second motion to dismiss, if any of Plaintiff's remaining claims survive. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/8/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

RICHARD BLANCHARD,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, et al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:11-cv-01127-ECR-PAL
ORDER
(Mot Stay - Dkt. #57)

12
13
14
15

Before the court is Plaintiff’s Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #54) and
Motion to Stay (Dkt. #55). The court has considered the Motion and Defendant’s Response (Dkt. #57).
In an Order (Dkt. #53) entered May 24, 2012, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to stay

16

submission of the discovery plan and scheduling order pending decision on Defendant Quality Loan

17

Service Corporation’s second motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s motion to stay argues it is in the interest of

18

judicial economy to stay all further litigation proceedings pending the completion of discovery

19

exchanges between the parties under Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.

20

However, the proposed discovery plan and scheduling order does not indicate what, if any, discovery

21

Plaintiff proposes to exchange. To the contrary, the proposed discovery plan and scheduling order

22

indicates Plaintiff stipulates to stay proceedings pending the court’s decision on his motion to stay. As

23

a stay has already been entered,

24

IT IS ORDERED that:

25

1.

APPROVED and is DENIED.

26
27
28

Plaintiff’s proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #54) is NOT

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (Dkt. #55) is DENIED as moot. The parties shall file a
proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order no later than 30 days after the

1

district judge decides Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation’s second motion to

2

dismiss if any of Plaintiff’s remaining claims survive.

3

Dated this 8th day of June, 2012

4
5
6

______________________________________
_______________________________
_____
_
_
_
Peggy A. Leen
e y
ee
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2