Glynn v. Geico Indemnity Company

Filing 18

ORDER on Stipulation Denying without Prejudice 17 Stipulation for Protective Order and Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 BRIAN GLYNN, 8 9 10 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendants. 2:11-cv-01175-KJD-CWH ORDER 12 This matter is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on the parties’ Stipulation for 13 Protective Order and Protective Order (#17), filed on December 22, 2011. The stipulation is 14 denied as submitted. The parties have not set forth the appropriate rule, procedure or law 15 addressing the filing of documents under seal in the District of Nevada. In subparagph E of the 16 stipulation, the parties reference Rule 26(b) of the Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure. The Federal 17 Rules of Civil Procedure apply in diversity cases. Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3D 1068, 1073 (9th 18 Cir. 2005) (citations omitted). Accordingly, 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation for Protective Order and 20 Protective Order (#17) is denied without prejudice. 21 DATED this 28th day of December, 2011. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?