Robinson v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada

Filing 6

ORDER that the clerk of the court file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner shall file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, raising the same grounds that he raises in the petition 1 , in United States v. Robinson, 2:95-CR-000 58-RCJ, within thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a blank § 2255 form. The clerk shall also keep this civil action open until disposition of the § 2255 motion for statistical purposes. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/27/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, form to petitioner)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 IN THE MATTER OF JAMES ROBINSON, Petitioner. Case No. 2:11-CV-01209-PMP-(LRL) ORDER 12 13 Before the court is the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 14 Petitioner is challenging the validity of his sentence in a federal criminal case, United States v. 15 Robinson, 2:95-CR-00058-RCJ. The appropriate remedy for his claims is through a motion 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed in United States v. Robinson. 17 18 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 2255, raising the same grounds that he raises in the petition (#1), in United States v. Robinson, 21 2:95-CR-00058-RCJ, within thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered. The clerk of 22 the court shall send petitioner a blank § 2255 form. The clerk shall also keep this civil action open 23 until disposition of the § 2255 motion for statistical purposes. 24 DATED: September 27, 2011. 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?