Santos v. Allen et al
Filing
163
ORDER that 147 Request for Clarification is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/22/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
RONALD R. SANTOS,
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
13
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “request for clarification” regarding the Scheduling
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
vs.
10
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
14
Case No. 2:11-cv-01251-KJD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 147)
Order and Discovery Plan. Docket No. 147. No response was filed. See Docket.
15
On March 5, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to extend the discovery deadline to
16
June 30, 2015. Docket No. 108. However, on June 24, 2015, this Court stayed the proceedings for
17
90 days, and ordered the parties to file a joint status report no later than September 29, 2015.
18
Docket No. 128. On July 20, 2015, the Court lifted the stay, and Plaintiff filed a renewed motion to
19
extend discovery on August 3, 2015. Docket Nos. 134, 140. On August 11, 2015, the Court granted
20
Plaintiff’s motion and extended the discovery deadline 90 days, from June 30, 2015 to September
21
28, 2015. Docket No. 141.
22
Plaintiff now requests the Court to clarify the discovery deadline. Docket No. 147.
23
However, as noted above, the Court has already ruled on the issue, and it is clearly reflected in the
24
docket. Plaintiff’s request is therefore DENIED as moot.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: September 22, 2015
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?