Santos v. Allen et al

Filing 196

ORDER that Plaintiff's Motions 191 , 192 , and 193 are DENIED, as they are not ripe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
RONALD R. SANTOS,

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

14

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, Docket No. 191;

15

Plaintiff’s motion for imposition of sanctions, Docket No. 192; and Plaintiff’s motion to hold

16

Defendant Cole Morrow in contempt of court if non-compliant, Docket No. 193. All three motions

17

are based upon Plaintiff’s assumption that Defendant Morrow will not provide responses to

18

currently-outstanding discovery requests. “A claim resting upon contingent future events that may

19

not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all, is not fit for adjudication.” Texas v. United

20

States, 523 U.S. 296 (1998) (internal citations omitted). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s

21

motions, Docket Nos. 191, 192, and 193, as they are not ripe.

9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
12
Defendants.

22

ORDER
(Docket Nos. 191, 192, 193)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Case No. 2:11-cv-01251-KJD-NJK

DATED: October 23, 2015.

24
25
26
27
28

NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge