SHIFT4 Corporation v. Martin

Filing 52

ORDER Denying as moot 8 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/1/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9
10

SHIFT4 Corporation, a Nevada
corporation,

Case No. 2:11-cv-01315-MMD-PAL

11
Plaintiff,

ORDER

12
v.
13

15

CRAIG MARTIN, an Arizona resident,
PHOENIX PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
d/b/a ELECTRONIC PAYMENT
EXCHANGE,

16

Defendant.

14

17
18

Before this Court is plaintiff SHIFT4 Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss defendant’s

19

counterclaim (dkt. no. 8). The Court previously granted plaintiff’s motion to amend its

20

complaint (dkt. no. 21). In response to plaintiff’s amended complaint, defendant filed an

21

amended answer and counterclaim. (Dkt. nos. 23 and 27.) Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss

22

the original counterclaim is rendered moot by defendant’s filing of its amended

23

counterclaim.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as

24
25
26

moot.
DATED THIS 1st day of August 2012.

27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE