Injazat Technology Fund B.S.C. v. Najafi et al

Filing 23

DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Injazat Technology Fund, B.S.C. and against Defendant Hamid Najafi in the amount of $3,426,553.45, with interest to accrue on the judgment from the date of the judgment at the statutory rate. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/10/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 INJAZAT TECHNOLOGY FUND B.S.C., 2:11-CV-1355 JCM (GWF) 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 HAMID NAJAFI, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 ORDER 16 Presently before the court is plaintiff Injazat Technology Fund, B.S.C.’s motion for entry of 17 default judgment against defendant Hamid Najafi. (Doc. #22). Plaintiff has filed the affidavit of 18 Jeffrey S. Rugg (doc. #70-A) in support of its motion. Defendant has not filed an opposition. 19 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment 20 for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by 21 affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22 55(b)(2) provides that “a court may enter a default judgment after the party seeking default applies 23 to the clerk of the court as required by subsection (a) of this rule.” Pursuant to local practice, the 24 clerk has converted this motion to a Rule 55(b)(2) motion and referred it to the court for 25 adjudication. 26 Plaintiff filed this suit on August 22, 2011. (Doc. #1). On August 28, 2011, defendant Najafi 27 was served with a copy of the summons. (Doc. #11). To date, defendant Najafi has not appeared 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 in this matter. This court previously granted plaintiff’s petition to confirm the aribitral award against 2 Najafi in the amount of $3,426,553.45. (Doc. #18). On October 3, 2011, and October 21, 2011, the 3 clerk entered notice of default against Hamid Najafi for his failure to respond or otherwise defend. 4 (Docs. #16 and #21). 5 In light of the court’s previous confirmation of the arbitral award, and defendant Najafi’s 6 failure to appear in this case, this court finds that entering default judgment against Najafi is 7 appropriate. 8 Accordingly, 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion for 10 default judgment (doc. #22) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff in the 12 amount of $3,426,553.45, with interest to accrue on the judgment from the date of the judgment at 13 the statutory rate. 14 DATED November 10, 2011. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?