Injazat Technology Fund B.S.C. v. Najafi et al
Filing
23
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Injazat Technology Fund, B.S.C. and against Defendant Hamid Najafi in the amount of $3,426,553.45, with interest to accrue on the judgment from the date of the judgment at the statutory rate. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/10/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
INJAZAT TECHNOLOGY FUND
B.S.C.,
2:11-CV-1355 JCM (GWF)
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
12
HAMID NAJAFI, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
ORDER
16
Presently before the court is plaintiff Injazat Technology Fund, B.S.C.’s motion for entry of
17
default judgment against defendant Hamid Najafi. (Doc. #22). Plaintiff has filed the affidavit of
18
Jeffrey S. Rugg (doc. #70-A) in support of its motion. Defendant has not filed an opposition.
19
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment
20
for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by
21
affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
22
55(b)(2) provides that “a court may enter a default judgment after the party seeking default applies
23
to the clerk of the court as required by subsection (a) of this rule.” Pursuant to local practice, the
24
clerk has converted this motion to a Rule 55(b)(2) motion and referred it to the court for
25
adjudication.
26
Plaintiff filed this suit on August 22, 2011. (Doc. #1). On August 28, 2011, defendant Najafi
27
was served with a copy of the summons. (Doc. #11). To date, defendant Najafi has not appeared
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
in this matter. This court previously granted plaintiff’s petition to confirm the aribitral award against
2
Najafi in the amount of $3,426,553.45. (Doc. #18). On October 3, 2011, and October 21, 2011, the
3
clerk entered notice of default against Hamid Najafi for his failure to respond or otherwise defend.
4
(Docs. #16 and #21).
5
In light of the court’s previous confirmation of the arbitral award, and defendant Najafi’s
6
failure to appear in this case, this court finds that entering default judgment against Najafi is
7
appropriate.
8
Accordingly,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion for
10
default judgment (doc. #22) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
11
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff in the
12
amount of $3,426,553.45, with interest to accrue on the judgment from the date of the judgment at
13
the statutory rate.
14
DATED November 10, 2011.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?