JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Meritage Homes Corp. et al

Filing 57

ORDER Granting 54 Motion to Substitute Party. Development Specialists, Inc. substituted for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Plaintiff in this action against Meritage, and JPMorgan shall remain in this case as a counterdefendant only. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:11-cv-01364-PMP -CWH Document 55 Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF JPMORGAN AND DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC. FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 25(c) v. MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION AND MERITAGE HOMES OF NEVADA, INC., Defendants. 15 16 Case No. 11-cv-01364-PMP-CWH Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan” or “Plaintiff”), as Administrative 17 Agent and Development Specialists, Inc. (“DSI”) filed their Motion Of JPMorgan And 18 Development Specialists, Inc. For Substitution Of Parties Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil 19 Procedure 25(c) [DE 54]. Upon consideration of the motion and response, and good cause 20 appearing, 21 IT IS ORDERED: 22 DSI shall be substituted for JPMorgan as Plaintiff in this action to pursue the claims 23 24 against Meritage, and JPMorgan shall remain in this case as a counterdefendant only. Dated: December 13, 2011. 25 26 ________________________________ PHILIP M. PRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 ny-1001380 1 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 25(C)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?