JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Meritage Homes Corp. et al
Filing
57
ORDER Granting 54 Motion to Substitute Party. Development Specialists, Inc. substituted for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Plaintiff in this action against Meritage, and JPMorgan shall remain in this case as a counterdefendant only. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:11-cv-01364-PMP -CWH Document 55
Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF
JPMORGAN AND DEVELOPMENT
SPECIALISTS, INC. FOR
SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 25(c)
v.
MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION AND
MERITAGE HOMES OF NEVADA, INC.,
Defendants.
15
16
Case No. 11-cv-01364-PMP-CWH
Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan” or “Plaintiff”), as Administrative
17
Agent and Development Specialists, Inc. (“DSI”) filed their Motion Of JPMorgan And
18
Development Specialists, Inc. For Substitution Of Parties Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil
19
Procedure 25(c) [DE 54]. Upon consideration of the motion and response, and good cause
20
appearing,
21
IT IS ORDERED:
22
DSI shall be substituted for JPMorgan as Plaintiff in this action to pursue the claims
23
24
against Meritage, and JPMorgan shall remain in this case as a counterdefendant only.
Dated: December 13, 2011.
25
26
________________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
ny-1001380
1
MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 25(C)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?