Daou v. Abelson et al

Filing 121

ORDER that the parties shall meet and confer, and shall file a joint status report on or before 4/7/2014, advising the Court whether the parties intend to try the remaining claims, whether the parties intend to seek relief regarding the remaining claims via dispositive motions, or whether the remaining claims have otherwise been resolved. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/9/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 *** ) FOUAD DAOU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RICK A. ABELSON, SOURYA ) ABELSON, NAJWA ABAZAKI, ) MAYSOUN FLETCHER, and AKRAM H. ) ABOLHOSEN, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) AND ALL RELATED ) COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD ) PARTY CLAIMS ) ) 2:11-CV-01385-PMP-GWF ORDER The Court having resolved the pending motions to dismiss and for summary judgment, the following claims remain pending: 22 • Plaintiff Fouad Daou’s claims against Defendant Sourya Abelson; 23 • Defendants/Counterclaimants Riad Abelson and Akram Abolhosen’s 24 25 26 counterclaims against Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Fouad Daou; and • Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs Riad Abelson and Akram Abolhosen’s third party claims against Third Party Defendants Donia Daou and Ziad Daou. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer, and shall file a joint 1 2 status report on or before April 7, 2014, advising the Court whether the parties intend to try 3 the remaining claims, whether the parties intend to seek relief regarding the remaining 4 claims via dispositive motions, or whether the remaining claims have otherwise been 5 resolved. 6 7 8 9 DATED: March 9, 2014 _______________________________ PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?