Hopkins v. Neven et al
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Clerk of the Court shall send petitioner two copies of an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner, one copy of the instructions for the same, two copies of a blank 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition form, one copy of instructions for the same, and a copy of the petition filed in this action (ECF No. 1 ). Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
7
8
9
TYON HOPKINS,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
D.W. NEVEN, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
____________________________________/
2:11-cv-01434-PMP-PAL
ORDER
10
11
This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254,
12
by a Nevada state prisoner. Neither a filing fee nor an application to proceed in forma pauperis was
13
submitted with the petition. Petitioner must either submit the $5.00 filing fee for habeas petitions or
14
an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
15
16
17
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to the
filing of a new petition in a new action.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send petitioner two copies of
18
an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner, one copy of the instructions for the same, two
19
copies of a blank 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition form, one copy of instructions for the same, and a
20
copy of the petition filed in this action (ECF No. 1).
21
22
23
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may file a new petition in a new action, but he
may not file further documents in this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
DATED: September 8, 2011.
25
26
27
28
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?