Hara-Isa v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 15 Stipulation to Dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
JULIE A. MERSCH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 004695
LAW OFFICE OF JULIE A. MERSCH
1100 E. Bridger Ave.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 387-5868
Fax: (702) 387-0109
jam@merschlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
NANCY HARA-ISA
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
vs.
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF
CANADA, a Massachusetts corporation;
DOES I through V inclusive; and ROES I
through V, inclusive,
13
Defendants.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. : 2:11-cv-01457-LRH-PAL
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE, AND ORDER
Plaintiff NANCY HARA-ISA and Defendant SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
16
OF CANADA hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action in its entirety, with prejudice, each
17
party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs as set forth in the Release between the parties.
DATED this 20th day of April, 2012.
18
19
LAW OFFICE OF JULIE A. MERSCH
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, PC
By:
By:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
////
27
////
28
////
/s/ Julie A. Mersch
Julie A. Mersch, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 004695
1100 E. Bridger
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Eric P. Mathisen
Jill Garcia, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 007805
Eric P. Mathisen, Esq.
Wells Fargo Tower, Ste. 1500
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy.
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Defendant
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED that this case shall hereby be dismissed in its entirety with
3
prejudice, each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs as set forth in the Release
4
between the parties.
5
Dated this 23rd day of April, 2012.
____
6
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
W:\HARA-ISA\PLDGS\Stip2Dismiss.wpd
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?