Edmund v. Donahoe et al

Filing 4

ORDER Affirming 3 Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/1/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 SHIRLEY R. EDMOND, 7 Plaintiffs, 8 vs. 9 PATRICK R. DONAHUE, et atl., Defendants. 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-CV-1467-PMP-GWF ORDER 11 12 Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff Shirley Edmond’s 13 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #1), filed September 12, 2011, and 14 Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #2), filed September 14, 2011. 15 On October 6, 2011, the Honorable George Foley, Jr., United States Magistrate 16 Judge, entered a Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #3) recommending 17 that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Plaintiff’s Motion for 18 Appointment of Counsel be denied. Plaintiff was given notice to file written objections with the court to 19 20 Magistrate Judge Foley’s Report and Recommendations within fourteen (14) days 21 after being served. To date no objections have been filed and the time to do so has 22 now expired. 23 In addition, Plaintiff was given up to and including October 31, 2011, to 24 submit to the Clerk’s Office $350.00 for filing a civil action, or the case would be 25 dismissed. To date no filing fee has been submitted. 26 /// 1 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in 2 accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that 3 Magistrate Judge Foley’s Report of Findings and Recommendation should be 4 Affirmed. 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley’s Report 6 of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #3) are AFFIRMED and Plaintiff Shirley 7 R. Edmond’s Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. 8 9 DATED: November 1, 2011. 10 11 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?