Cammareri v Bank of America et al.,

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 26 Stipulation to Stay Discovery and Approving 26 Stipulation Regarding a Claw-Back Provision for Documents Inadvertently Disclosed in Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 ADRIENNE CAMMARERI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BANK OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:11-cv-01501-KJD-PAL ORDER 12 13 In a prior order (Dkt #25) the court entered a discovery plan and scheduling order because the 14 parties had not submitted one as required by LR 26-1. The order established a June 18, 2012 discovery 15 cutoff and other deadlines consistent with LR 26-1(e). The parties have now submitted a Discovery 16 Plan (Dkt. #26) which proposes that discovery be stayed until after a decision of Defendant’s pending 17 Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #18) filed January 4, 2012. The motion to dismiss seeks to dismiss the entire 18 complaint, and the parties agree that staying discovery will save time and resources on claims and 19 issues which may ultimately be dismissed. The parties agreed to serve initial disclosures on or before 20 March 8, 2012, and propose that they submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order after 21 decision of the motion to dismiss if any claims survive. Finally, the parties agreed to a Claw-Back 22 Provision regarding the inadvertent disclosure of documents produced in discovery in this case. 23 Having reviewed and considered the matter, and for good cause shown: 24 1. 25 GRANTED. 26 2. 27 28 The parties’ stipulation to stay discovery until after decision of the motion to dismiss is The parties shall have 14 days from decision of the pending motion to dismiss to submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order with respect to any claim that survives. /// 1 3. The parties’ stipulation regarding a claw-back provision for documents inadvertently 2 disclosed in discovery is APPROVED in the form memorialized in the parties’ 3 Discovery Plan (Dkt. #26) as follows: 4 If a party inadvertently discloses information during discovery which is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection, (1) the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it, and (2) a lawyer who receives a document relating to the action and knows or reasonably should know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved if a claimed privilege is disputed; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of a disputed privilege. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated this 13th day of March, 2012. 13 14 15 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?