McCarty v. Roos et al

Filing 126

ORDER Granting 122 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 116 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint re 7 Amended Complaint. Responses due by 2/12/2013. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/25/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8

ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY,

9
10
11

2:11-CV-1538 JCM (NJK)

Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN V. ROOS, et al.,

12
Defendants.

13
14

ORDER

15

Presently before the court is state defendants Patrick Saunders and Charlene Hoerth’s motion

16

for extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend complaint. (Doc. # 122).

17

Pro se plaintiff Robert Joseph McCarty responded. (Doc. # 124).

18

State defendants request an extension of time based on the length and complexity of pro se

19

plaintiff’s, Robert Joseph McCarty, second amended complaint. Plaintiff seeks leave to allege

20

constitutional violations that did not appear in his first amended complaint.

21

Good cause appearing,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that state defendants Patrick

23

Saunders and Charlene Hoerth’s motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s motion for

24

leave to amend complaint (doc. # 122) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

25

...

26

...

27

...

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants have up to, and including, February 12,
2013, to respond to plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend.
DATED January 25, 2013.

4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-