McCarty v. Roos et al

Filing 148

ORDER Granting 146 Motion to Strike 142 Response to Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/23/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY, 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff(s), vs. JOHN V. ROOS, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11-cv-01538-JCM-NJK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE (Docket No. 146) 12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff’s response to the motion to 13 dismiss. See Docket No. 146; see also Docket No. 142 (response to motion to dismiss). For the 14 reasons discussed below, that motion is hereby GRANTED. The Local Rules make clear that briefs 15 shall be limited to 30 pages of double-spaced text. Local Rules 7-4 (unless otherwise ordered by the 16 Court, responsive briefs shall be limited to 30 pages); 10-1 (with a few exceptions, “lines of 17 typewritten text shall be double-spaced”). Plaintiff’s response is more than 53 pages of single18 spaced text in violation of the above rules. Accordingly, the court hereby STRIKES Plaintiff’s 19 response at Docket No. 142. 20 Plaintiff shall have until May 6, 2013, to submit a response to the motion to dismiss that 21 complies with the Local Rules, and shall be limited to no more than 30 pages of double-spaced text. 22 Defendants have already filed a reply brief, see Docket No. 147, but may file an amended reply to 23 the motion to dismiss no later than May 13, 2013. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: April 23, 2013 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?