McCarty v. Roos et al
Filing
148
ORDER Granting 146 Motion to Strike 142 Response to Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/23/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
JOHN V. ROOS, et al.,
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:11-cv-01538-JCM-NJK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STRIKE (Docket No. 146)
12
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff’s response to the motion to
13
dismiss. See Docket No. 146; see also Docket No. 142 (response to motion to dismiss). For the
14
reasons discussed below, that motion is hereby GRANTED. The Local Rules make clear that briefs
15
shall be limited to 30 pages of double-spaced text. Local Rules 7-4 (unless otherwise ordered by the
16
Court, responsive briefs shall be limited to 30 pages); 10-1 (with a few exceptions, “lines of
17
typewritten text shall be double-spaced”). Plaintiff’s response is more than 53 pages of single18
spaced text in violation of the above rules. Accordingly, the court hereby STRIKES Plaintiff’s
19
response at Docket No. 142.
20
Plaintiff shall have until May 6, 2013, to submit a response to the motion to dismiss that
21
complies with the Local Rules, and shall be limited to no more than 30 pages of double-spaced text.
22
Defendants have already filed a reply brief, see Docket No. 147, but may file an amended reply to
23
the motion to dismiss no later than May 13, 2013.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
DATED: April 23, 2013
26
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?