McCarty v. Roos et al

Filing 208

ORDER re 200 MOTION to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/25/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY, 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 JOHN V. ROOS, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11-cv-01538-JCM-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 200) Pending before the Court is the Federal Defendants’ second motion to stay. Docket No. 17 200.1 That motion seeks a stay of the deadlines to respond to (1) Plaintiff’s cross motion for 18 judgment (Docket No. 184), (2) Plaintiff’s motion for joinder (Docket No. 196), and (3) Plaintiff’s 19 motion for writ of habeas corpus declaration action (Docket No. 197). The Court hereby ORDERS 20 as follows: 21 With respect to the “joinder” motion (Docket No. 196), the request for a stay is hereby 22 DENIED as moot in light of the order issued concurrently herewith denying Plaintiff’s joinder 23 motion. With respect to motion to stay responses to the cross motion for judgment and motion for 24 25 habeas relief (Docket Nos. 184, 197), the Court ORDERS any response from Plaintiff to be filed no 26 27 28 1 Two other motions to stay were filed by Defendants, see Docket Nos. 180, 181, which are being resolved by separate order. 1 later than October 2, 2013, and any reply no later than October 4, 2013. In the interim, the deadline 2 for the Federal Defendants to respond to those motions (Docket Nos. 184, 197) is hereby 3 CONTINUED for 21 days to enable the Court to rule on the pending motion to stay. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: September 25, 2013 6 7 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?