McCarty v. Roos et al

Filing 249

ORDER Denying 238 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Compel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that remaining Defendants and Plaintiff shall file statements regarding a schedule for conducting discovery and filing dispositive motions by 4/22/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 04/08/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY,

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

14

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s cross motion to compel discovery. Docket No. 238.

9
Plaintiff(s),
10
vs.
11
JOHN V. ROOS, et al.,
12
Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:11-cv-01538-JCM-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 238)

15

Defendants filed responses opposing that motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply. Docket Nos. 240-242.

16

The Court previously determined that discovery should commence following resolution of several

17

then-pending dispositive motions. See, e.g., Docket No. 209. Those motions have now been

18

resolved, leaving at least some claims remaining in the case. See, e.g., Docket No. 235 at 2 (denying

19

motion to dismiss official capacity claims seeking prospective injunctive relief). Accordingly, the

20

remaining Defendants and Plaintiff shall file, no later than April 22, 2014, statements regarding a

21

schedule for conducting discovery and filing dispositive motions. These statements shall be no

22

longer than five pages in length. In light of the above, the cross motion to compel discovery (Docket

23

No. 238) is hereby DENIED as moot.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

DATED: April 8, 2014

26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge