McCarty v. Roos et al

Filing 59

ORDER Granting 44 Motion to Stay Requirement to File Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 5/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
VINCENT M. GARVEY
Deputy Branch Director
LYNN Y. LEE
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
P.O. Box 883
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendants U.S. Department of State,
U.S. Department of Justice, John Roos and Joseph
Koen Sued in Their Official Capacities

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
JOHN V. ROOS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

Case No. 2:11-CV-01538-JCM-(RJJ)

20
21

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING REQUIREMENT TO FILE
PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER

22

This Court, having reviewed the Unopposed Motion to Stay Requirement to File

23

Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by defendants the United States Department of

24

State, Department of Justice, and John Roos and Joseph Koen sued in their official capacities,

25

filed on May 3, 2012, hereby GRANTS the Motion and STAYS the parties’ obligation to file a

26

proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order pursuant to Local Rule 26-1 until (1) after all

1

defendants have filed responses to plaintiff’s Amended Complain, AND (2) further order by this

2

Court.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: May 23, 2012

_______________________
_
ROBERT J. JOHNSTON
United States Magistrate Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2