McCarty v. Roos et al

Filing 64

ORDER that defendants John Roos and Joseph Koens motion to extend time to respond to amended complaint 63 is GRANTED. Defendants shall file a response to the amended complaint on or before August 10, 2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/8/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11

2:11-CV-1538 JCM (RJJ)

ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN V. ROOS, et al.,

12
Defendants.

13
14

ORDER

15
16

Presently before the court is defendants John Roos and Joseph Koen’s motion to extend time
to respond to amended complaint. (Doc. #63).

17

Defendants assert that they have not been properly served in their individual capacities

18

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f). (Doc. #63). However, their responses to the

19

amended complaint, in their official capacities, are due on June 11, 2012. (Doc. #36). Defendants

20

argue that they are both located overseas, and the United States government is still evaluating the

21

information regarding plaintiff’s claims. Thus, defendants request an extension of sixty days, up to

22

and including August 10, 2012, in which to file an answer to the amended complaint. (Doc. #63).

23

Good cause appearing,

24

...

25

...

26

...

27

...

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants John Roos and

2

Joseph Koen’s motion to extend time to respond to amended complaint (doc. #63) be, and the same

3

hereby is, GRANTED. Defendants shall file a response to the amended complaint on or before

4

August 10, 2012.

5

DATED June 8, 2012.

6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-