BYW Franchise Development LLC v. JH Devine Investments 10, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Vacate hearing on 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction scheduled for 10/7/11. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 5 Matthew J. Kreutzer, Esq. Nevada Bar. No. 8834, Jennifer A. Gores, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11383 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702.678.5070 Facsimile: 702.878.9995 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA BYW FRANCHISE DEVELOPMENT, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. JH DEVINE INVESTMENTS 10, INC., a California corporation, and CHERIE HUILLADE, a California citizen, CASE NO.: 2:11-CV-01568-GMN-GWF MOTION TO VACATE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING SET FOR FRIDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2011 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff BYW Franchise Development, LLC (“BYW”), by and through counsel, moves this 19 Court to vacate the hearing set on BYW’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, which was set by the 20 Court’s Order dated September 30, 2011. In support of this Motion, BYW states as follows: 21 1. On October 4, 2011, BYW’s counsel, Matthew Kreutzer, received a call from David 22 Reaves, Esq., who is the Chapter 7 bankruptcy Trustee for the individual debtor, Tonja Demoff, in a 23 case currently pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona, Case No. 24 2:10-bk-00303-RTB. Mr. Reaves stated that it is his position that BYW is 100% owned by Ms. 25 Demoff, and Ms. Demoff’s ownership interest in BYW constitutes the property of the bankruptcy 26 estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 541. 27 28 2. Mr. Reaves told BYW’s counsel that Ms. Demoff has no authority to act on behalf of BYW, and that the actions of Ms. Demoff in filing this lawsuit have not been authorized by the 1 1 bankruptcy estate, Mr. Reaves, or the Court. Mr. Reaves followed the telephone discussion with a 2 letter to Mr. Kreutzer confirming the conversation. A copy of the letter from Mr. Reaves is attached 3 hereto as “Exhibit 1.” 4 3. Ms. Demoff is the primary client contact for BYW, and is the individual who 5 authorized BYW’s counsel to file the instant lawsuit. Mr. Reaves has not authorized plaintiff’s 6 counsel to file or proceed with this lawsuit. 7 4. Due to the conflicting positions and instructions from Ms. Demoff and Mr. Reaves, 8 plaintiff’s counsel is unable to proceed with representing BYW in this lawsuit or at the scheduled 9 hearing until the issue of control of BYW has been resolved. 10 11 12 13 WHEREFORE, BYW respectfully request that this Court vacate the preliminary injunction hearing presently set for October 7, 2011. Respectfully Submitted, Dated this 5th day of October, 2011. ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 14 15 By: /s/ Matthew J. Kreutzer___ Matthew J. Kreutzer 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702.678.5070 Facsimile: 702.878.9995 mkreutzer@armstrongteasdale.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of October, 2011. 22 23 24 Gloria M. Navarro United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 2 EXHIBIT 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?