BYW Franchise Development LLC v. JH Devine Investments 10, Inc. et al
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Vacate hearing on 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction scheduled for 10/7/11. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
5
Matthew J. Kreutzer, Esq.
Nevada Bar. No. 8834,
Jennifer A. Gores, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11383
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702.678.5070
Facsimile: 702.878.9995
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
BYW FRANCHISE DEVELOPMENT, a Nevada
limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JH DEVINE INVESTMENTS 10, INC., a
California corporation, and CHERIE HUILLADE, a
California citizen,
CASE NO.: 2:11-CV-01568-GMN-GWF
MOTION TO VACATE
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
HEARING SET FOR FRIDAY,
OCTOBER 7, 2011
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff BYW Franchise Development, LLC (“BYW”), by and through counsel, moves this
19
Court to vacate the hearing set on BYW’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, which was set by the
20
Court’s Order dated September 30, 2011. In support of this Motion, BYW states as follows:
21
1.
On October 4, 2011, BYW’s counsel, Matthew Kreutzer, received a call from David
22
Reaves, Esq., who is the Chapter 7 bankruptcy Trustee for the individual debtor, Tonja Demoff, in a
23
case currently pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona, Case No.
24
2:10-bk-00303-RTB. Mr. Reaves stated that it is his position that BYW is 100% owned by Ms.
25
Demoff, and Ms. Demoff’s ownership interest in BYW constitutes the property of the bankruptcy
26
estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 541.
27
28
2.
Mr. Reaves told BYW’s counsel that Ms. Demoff has no authority to act on behalf of
BYW, and that the actions of Ms. Demoff in filing this lawsuit have not been authorized by the
1
1
bankruptcy estate, Mr. Reaves, or the Court. Mr. Reaves followed the telephone discussion with a
2
letter to Mr. Kreutzer confirming the conversation. A copy of the letter from Mr. Reaves is attached
3
hereto as “Exhibit 1.”
4
3.
Ms. Demoff is the primary client contact for BYW, and is the individual who
5
authorized BYW’s counsel to file the instant lawsuit. Mr. Reaves has not authorized plaintiff’s
6
counsel to file or proceed with this lawsuit.
7
4.
Due to the conflicting positions and instructions from Ms. Demoff and Mr. Reaves,
8
plaintiff’s counsel is unable to proceed with representing BYW in this lawsuit or at the scheduled
9
hearing until the issue of control of BYW has been resolved.
10
11
12
13
WHEREFORE, BYW respectfully request that this Court vacate the preliminary injunction
hearing presently set for October 7, 2011.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated this 5th day of October, 2011.
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
14
15
By: /s/ Matthew J. Kreutzer___
Matthew J. Kreutzer
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702.678.5070
Facsimile: 702.878.9995
mkreutzer@armstrongteasdale.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of October, 2011.
22
23
24
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
2
EXHIBIT 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?