Cohen v. Clark County School District et al
Filing
86
ORDER Denying 84 Notice for Telephonic Conference as Scheduled For September 24, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 9/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: Mailed to Plaintiff via Certified Mail - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
***
10
CYNTHIA KAPPENMAN COHEN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
14
Defendant,
15
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:11-cv-1619-MLH-RJJ
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Notice for Telephonic Conference as
Scheduled For September 24, 2012 (#84).
18
The Court has reviewed the Notice (#84) and the Response (#85). The Court notes from
19
the docket that this matter has been rescheduled numerous times. Further, this matter has been
20
specifically been scheduled at a time where Plaintiff’s school duties will NOT interfere with her
21
attendance at a court hearing. The Court also notes that participation by telephone conference call
22
is NOT an option. Good cause appearing therefore ,
23
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Notice for Telephonic Conference as
Scheduled For September 24, 2012 (#84) is DENIED.
25
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Cynthia Kappenman Cohen is REQUIRED to
be present in Court for this hearing as scheduled.
27
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NO further continuances will be granted.
....
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is advised that failure to appear for this
hearing will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on the
Plaintiff by certified mail return receipt requested.
DATED this 19th
day of September, 2012.
6
7
8
9
ROBERT J. JOHNSTON
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?