Vierich et al v. MGM Grand Hotel, LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDERED that Defendants' Demands for Security of Costs Against Wolfgang Vierich 12 , The Vitala Group 13 , Vitala Group Investments Limited 14 , Vitala Management Services Limited 15 , Vitala Limited 16 , Vitala & Keller Associates Limited 17 , and Vitala International Consultants Limited 18 are GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that each Plaintiff deposit $1,000 with the Clerk of Court as security of costs. FURTHER ORDERED that this action be STAYED until each Plaintiff makes the required deposit with the Clerk of Court. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/4/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
WOLFGANG VIERICH,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:11-CV-01623-KJD-CWH
ORDER
MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Before the Court are Defendants MGM Grand Hotel, LLC and Mandalay Corp.’s Demands
14
for Security of Costs Against Plaintiffs Wolfgang Vierich (#12), The Vitala Group (#13), Vitala
15
Group Investments Limited (#14), Vitala Management Services Limited (#15), Vitala Limited (#16),
16
Vitala & Keller Associates Limited (#17), and Vitala International Consultants Limited (#18). None
17
of the Plaintiffs has filed an opposition to the Demand for Security of Costs.
18
Under Nevada law, “[w]hen a plaintiff in an action resides out of the State, or is a foreign
19
corporation, security for the costs and charges which may be awarded against such plaintiff may be
20
required by the defendant.” NRS 18.130(1). “[W]hen so required, all proceedings in the action shall
21
be stayed until such an undertaking ... be filed with the clerk....” Id. “After the lapse of 30 days from
22
the service of notice that security is required ... upon proof thereof, and that no undertaking as
23
required has been filed, the court or judge may order the action to be dismissed.” NRS 18.130(4).
24
It is the policy of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada to enforce the
25
requirements of NRS 18.130 in diversity actions. Hamar v. Hyatt Corp., 98 F.R.D. 305, 305–306
26
(D.Nev.1983); Arrambide v. St. Mary’s Hosp., Inc., 647 F.Supp. 1148, 1149 (D.Nev.1986). Under
1
the statute, each plaintiff is required to provide security in the amount of $500 per defendant,
2
pursuant to NRS 18.130. Truck Ins. Exchange v. Tetzlaff, 683 F.Supp. 223, 227 (D.Nev.1988).
3
However, an indigent plaintiff need not provide security under NRS 18.130. Id. (citing Arrambide,
4
647 F.Supp. 1148 (D.Nev.1986)). If a plaintiff “is in fact indigent, he must demonstrate this in detail
5
by affidavit.” Arrambide, 647 F.Supp. at 1149.
6
Each of the Plaintiffs resides outside of the State of Nevada. Defendants have requested a
7
$1,000 deposit ($500 per Defendant) from each Plaintiff in this action as security for costs and
8
charges which may be awarded. None of the Plaintiffs have filed a motion in opposition. Failure to
9
oppose a motion constitutes consent to the granting of the motion. See Local Rule 7-2.
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Demands for Security of Costs
11
Against Wolfgang Vierich (#12), The Vitala Group (#13), Vitala Group Investments Limited (#14),
12
Vitala Management Services Limited (#15), Vitala Limited (#16), Vitala & Keller Associates
13
Limited (#17), and Vitala International Consultants Limited (#18) are GRANTED
14
15
16
17
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each Plaintiff deposit $1,000 with the Clerk of Court as
security of costs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be STAYED until each Plaintiff makes the
required deposit with the Clerk of Court.
DATED this 4th day of April 2012.
19
20
21
22
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?