Integrated Technological Systems, Inc. v. Green Dot Corporation
Filing
29
PROTECTIVE ORDER Granting 27 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Michael D. Rounds (Nevada Bar No. 4734)
Ryan Johnson (Nevada Bar No. 9070)
WATSON ROUNDS
777 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite 350
Las Vegas, NV 89107
Telephone: (702) 636-4902
mrounds@watsonrounds.com
rjohnson@watsonrounds.com
Steve W. Berman (admitted pro hac vice)
Andrew M. Volk (admitted pro hac vice)
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
11
Nicholas S. Boebel (admitted pro hac vice)
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
5001 Chowen Ave. S., Suite 2000
Minneapolis, MN 55410
Telephone: (612) 435-8644
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff Integrated Technological Systems, Inc.
13
[Attorneys for Defendant Green Dot Corp. Listed on Signature Page]
9
10
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
17
INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGICAL
SYSTEMS, INC.,
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ-PAL
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
v.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
GREEN DOT CORPORATION,
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and with the consent of
the parties to this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 1
005005-12 496664 V1
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
1
1.
Filed 01/12/12 Page 2 of 9
All documents, materials, items, and/or information which contain or comprise
2
confidential and sensitive research, development or commercial information produced either by a
3
party or by a non-party to or for any of the parties shall be governed by this Protective Order.
4
2.
Any information produced by any party or non-party as part of discovery in this
5
action may be designated by such party or non-party as (1) “Confidential” or (2) “Confidential-
6
Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” As a general guideline, materials designated “Confidential” shall be
7
those confidential and sensitive things that may be disclosed to the parties for the purpose of the
8
litigation, but which must be protected against disclosure to third parties. As a general guideline,
9
materials designated “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall be those confidential and
10
sensitive things of a proprietary business or technical nature which might be of value to a
11
potential competitor of the party or non-party holding the proprietary rights thereto, and which
12
must be protected from disclosure to such party and/or third parties. Absent a specific order by
13
this Court, information once designated as “Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes
14
Only” shall be used by parties solely in connection with this litigation, and not for any business,
15
competitive, or governmental purpose or function, and such information shall not be disclosed to
16
anyone except as provided herein.
17
3.
Any party or non-party wishing to come within the provisions of this Protective
18
Order shall designate, in writing, the documents, information, or portions thereof which he, she
19
or it considers confidential at the time such documents are produced or such information is
20
disclosed, or as soon thereafter as the person or entity seeking protection becomes aware of the
21
nature of the information or materials disclosed and sought to be protected hereunder. In the
22
instance of documents, the items produced must be marked “Confidential” or “Confidential-
23
Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by the producing party or non-party. In the instance of depositions,
24
counsel may, in the record of the deposition, designate the transcript or portion thereof as
25
“Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” and only the parties identified in
26
Paragraphs 4 and 5 may then be present in the depositions. The witness under deposition or his
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 2
005005-12 496664 V1
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
Filed 01/12/12 Page 3 of 9
1
counsel may invoke the provisions of this Protective Order in a timely manner, giving adequate
2
warning to counsel for the party or non-party that testimony about to be given is deemed
3
“Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” The designations should be made on the
4
record whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of a deposition either
5
“Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” provided written notice of such
6
designation is given to each party no later than ten (10) days following receipt of the deposition
7
transcript.
8
4.
Documents, deposition testimony, or answers to interrogatories stamped
9
“Confidential,” or copies or extracts therefrom, and compilations and summaries thereof, and the
10
information therein, may be given, shown, made available to, or communicated in any way only
11
to the parties and/or employees thereof, who agree in advance to abide by this Protective Order
12
by executing Attachment A hereto, and to whom it is necessary that the material be shown for
13
purposes of this litigation.
14
5.
Documents, deposition testimony, or answers to interrogatories stamped
15
“Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or copies or extracts therefrom, and summaries and
16
compilations thereof, and the information therein, may be given, shown, made available to, or
17
communicated in any way only to (a) the trial counsel designated on the pleadings for the law
18
firms of record in this actions and those of their staff to whom it is necessary that the materials
19
be shown for the purposes of this litigation; (b) consultants as defined in Paragraph 6 hereof.
20
6.
For purposes of Paragraph 5(b) hereof, a consultant shall be defined as a person
21
who is not an employee of a party nor anticipated to become an employee in the near future, and
22
who is retained or employed as a bona fide consultant or testifying expert for purposes of this
23
litigation, or members of their staffs, whether full or part-time, by or at the direction of counsel
24
for a party, provided that such consultant(s) shall first execute the Agreement of Attachment A.
25
26
7.
All confidential information covered by this order shall be kept in secure facilities
at trial counsel's offices and in no event be taken to or stored on the premises of a party without
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 3
005005-12 496664 V1
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
Filed 01/12/12 Page 4 of 9
1
having first received written permission from the party designating the document confidential,
2
and access to those facilities shall be permitted only to those designated persons set forth in
3
Paragraphs 4, 5, and 6 of this Protective Order as persons properly having access thereto under
4
the appropriately designated degree of confidentiality. All counsel for the parties who have
5
access to confidential information under this Protective Order acknowledge they are bound by
6
this Order and submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of enforcing this Order.
7
8.
Any party filing with the Court pages or parts of court papers, discovery
8
responses, production of documents or things, or deposition transcripts, which have been
9
designated as containing “Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information, or
10
any court papers purporting to reproduce or paraphrase such Confidential Information, shall seek
11
to file the papers under seal. No party or non-party shall file or submit for filing as part of the
12
Court record any documents under seal without first obtaining leave of the court.
13
Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal
14
bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in
15
Court.
16
9.
If any document or information designated to be “Confidential” or “Confidential-
17
Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to this Protective Order is used during the course of a deposition
18
herein, that portion of the deposition record reflecting such confidential information shall be
19
sealed and stamped with the designated degree of confidentiality, and access thereto shall be
20
limited pursuant to the other terms of this Protective Order.
21
10.
A party should designate as “Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes
22
Only” only such information or documents as the party reasonably and in good faith believes
23
require and justify protection under this Protective Order. If, at any time during the pendency or
24
trial of this action, counsel for any party claims that counsel for any other party is unreasonably
25
claiming certain information produced herein to be confidential, or otherwise wishes to have
26
materials re-designated, objecting/requesting counsel may make an appropriate application to
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 4
005005-12 496664 V1
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
Filed 01/12/12 Page 5 of 9
1
this Court, with confidential portions thereof to be kept under seal, requesting that specifically
2
identified documents, information, and/or deposition testimony be excluded from the provisions
3
of this Protective Order or downgraded in terms of the degree of protection provided. Before
4
filing any such application, the party seeking relief shall confer with the other party to determine
5
whether the matter can be resolved by agreement.
6
11.
The pretrial order submitted by the parties in this action shall address the
7
treatment at trial of documents, information or testimony designated “Confidential” or
8
“Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to this Protective Order, unless the confidentiality
9
of such information has been removed by agreement of counsel or by this Court in accordance
10
11
with the provisions of Paragraph 10 of this Protective Order.
12.
At any hearing relating to this litigation prior to trial before any judicial officer,
12
subject to the rules of evidence and order of the Court, a party may use any “Confidential” or
13
“Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information or documents for any purpose, provided that
14
adequate prior notice of such use is given to counsel for the opposing party to permit the
15
opposing party the opportunity to obtain appropriate protection from the Court, including a
16
request to the Court that the courtroom be cleared and that the court employees be advised as to
17
the terms of this Protective Order. If any party reasonably anticipates that “Confidential” or
18
“Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information or documents will be presented in any hearing
19
in this litigation, it may request that the Court close the courtroom during such presentation. If
20
the Court denies any such request, the use of “Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes
21
Only” information or documents in court shall not affect its coverage by this Protective Order or
22
constitute a waiver of secrecy with respect thereto.
23
13.
The terms of this Protective Order shall apply to all manner and means of
24
discovery, including entry onto land or premises and inspection of books, records, documents,
25
and tangible things.
26
14.
This Protective Order shall be effective on the date entered by the Court.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 5
005005-12 496664 V1
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
1
15.
Filed 01/12/12 Page 6 of 9
Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of this action, unless otherwise
2
agreed by the parties, all confidential materials and/or information shall be destroyed, unless the
3
producing party or non-party requests the return of the materials and/or information, in which
4
case all confidential materials and/or information shall be returned to the producing party or non-
5
party within ninety (90) days of the conclusion of this action. Notwithstanding this provision,
6
counsel for the parties may keep a full and complete record of all documents generated as a
7
result of this Litigation, including correspondence, handwritten notes, emails, deposition and
8
Court transcripts, and documents filed with the Court, subject to the terms of this Protective
9
Order.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
Dated: January 12, 2012
12
Michael D. Rounds (Nevada Bar No. 4734)
Ryan Johnson (Nevada Bar No. 9070)
WATSON ROUNDS
777 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite 350
Las Vegas, NV 89107
Telephone: (702) 636-4902
mrounds@watsonrounds.com
rjohnson@watsonrounds.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Of Counsel:
s/ Steve W. Berman
Steve W. Berman (admitted pro hac vice)
Andrew M. Volk (admitted pro hac vice )
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Nicholas S. Boebel (admitted pro hac vice )
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
5001 Chowen Ave. S., Ste. 2000
Minneapolis, MN 55410
Telephone: (612) 435-8644
Attorneys for Plaintiff Integrated
Technological Systems, Inc.
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 6
005005-12 496664 V1
W. WEST ALLEN
wallen@lrllaw.com
LEWIS AND ROCA LLP
3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 949-8230
Facsimile: (702) 949-8364
s/ J. Bennett Clark
J. BENNETT CLARK (admitted pro hac vice)
ben.clark@bryancave.com
AMEER GADO (admitted pro hac vice)
aagado@bryancave.com
BRYAN CAVE LLP
211 N. Broadway, Ste. 3600
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
Telephone: (314) 259-2000
Facsimile: (314) 259-2020
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
Green Dot Corporation
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
Filed 01/12/12 Page 7 of 9
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED
3
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
January 13, 2012
DATE:__________________________
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 7
005005-12 496664 V1
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
1
Filed 01/12/12 Page 8 of 9
ATTACHMENT A
2
3
AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
4
5
I,
, do solemnly swear that I am fully
6
familiar with the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order entered in Integrated Technological
7
Systems, Inc. v. Green Dot Corporation, United States District Court, District of Nevada, Civil
8
Action No. 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ-PAL, and hereby agree to comply with and be bound by the
9
terms and conditions of said Order unless and until modified by further Order of this Court. I
10
hereby consent to the jurisdiction of said Court for purposes of enforcing this order.
11
12
Dated:______________________
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 8
005005-12 496664 V1
Signed________________________
Case 2:11-cv-01626-RCJ -PAL Document 27
Filed 01/12/12 Page 9 of 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
On January 12, 2012, I caused to be electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of
3
the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following
4
attorneys of record:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
W. West Allen
wallen@lrlaw.com, PMENON@lrlaw.com, kwildman@lrlaw.com, dkelley@lrlaw.com
Steve W. Berman
steve@hbsslaw.com
Nicholas S. Boebel
nickb@hbsslaw.com
James B. Clark
ben.clark@bryancave.com, dorian.johnson@bryancave.com
Ameer Gado
aagado@bryancave.com, dorian.johnson@bryancave.com
Ryan E. Johnson
rjohnson@watsonrounds.com, lshapiro@watsonrounds.com,
pmerced@watsonrounds.com
Michael D Rounds
mrounds@watsonrounds.com, rhunter@watsonrounds.com,
rnofederal@watsonrounds.com, ayowell@watsonrounds.com
Andrew M. Volk
andrew@hbsslaw.com, dawn@hbsslaw.com
16
17
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
18
By: s/ Steve W. Berman
Steve W. Berman (admitted pro hac vice)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – 9
005005-12 496664 V1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?