Conboy, D.O v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

Filing 218

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Jury Trial Day 1 held on 3/24/2014 before Judge James C. Mahan. Crtrm Administrator: David Oakes; Pla Counsel: Robert Nersesian, Thea Sankiewicz; Def Counsel: Kym Cushing, Reuben Cawley; Court Reporter/ FTR #: Kathy Eismann; Time of Hearing: 9:00 a.m.; Courtroom: 6A; granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion to Strike.; ( Deadline to return exhibits set for 9/30/2014., Jury Trial continued to 3/25/2014 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXO)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA **** CAROLYN JEAN CONBOY, D.O., Plaintiff, 2:11-cv-1649-JCM-CWH vs. MINUTES OF THE COURT WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC., et al., Defendants. DATED: March 24, 2014 THE HONORABLE JAMES C. MAHAN DEPUTY CLERK DAVID OAKES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE COURT REPORTER KATHY EISMANN COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Robert Nersesian, Thea Sankiewicz COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Kym Cushing, Reuben Cawley MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS: Jury Trial Day One The Court convenes at 9:25 a.m. The Court addressed the Thirty-three prospective jurors. The Clerk is directed to administer the oath. Thirty-three prospective jurors are called and voir dire is conducted from 9:35 a.m., to 10:50 a.m. Peremptories are made and the following eight jurors are selected and sworn: REDACTED Court recessed at 10:50 a.m. Jury was admonished and excused. Court reconvened at 11:00 a.m., outside the presence of the jury to address defendant’s motion (#217). Court granted in part and denied in part. (See reporters transcript for details). Court recessed at 11:05 a.m. Court reconvened at 11:10 a.m., in the presence of the jury. Parties stipulated to their presence. Opening statements are made by Ms. Sankiewicz on behalf of the plaintiff from 11:15 a.m, to 11:35 a.m. Opening statements are made by Mr. Cushing on behalf of the defendant’s from 11:35 a.m., to 12:00 p.m. Carolyn Jean Conboy, D.O. vs. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, et al., 2:11-cv-1649-JCM-CWH Jury Trial Day (1) Page 2 Court recessed for lunch from 12:00 p.m., to 1:30 p.m. Jury was admonished and excused. Court reconvened at 1:35 p.m., in the presence of the jury. Parties stipulated to their presence. Mr. Nersesian requested plaintiff’s exhibits 1 through 63 be admitted into evidence. The court granted that request and ordered plaintiff’s exhibits 1 through 63 be admitted into evidence. JOHN ROBERT KRAWIEC, is called to the stand, sworn and testified on direct examination by Ms. Sankiewicz, defendant’s exhibit #525 is marked and admitted into evidence, cross examination by Mr. Cushing. (The deposition of John Krawiec is published in open court). Defendant’s exhibit #503AF, is marked and admitted into evidence, re-direct examination by Ms. Sankiewicz, then is excused. CAROLYN CONBOY D.O., is called to the stand, sworn and testified on direct examination by Ms. Sankiewicz, defendant’s exhibit #518 is marked and admitted into evidence. Court recessed at 2:55 p.m., to 3:10 p.m. Jury as admonished and excused. Court reconvened at 3:10 p.m., in the presence of the jury. Parties stipulated to their presence. CAROLYN CONBOY D.O., having previously been sworn, resumed the stand and testified further on direct examination by Ms. Sankiewicz, defendant’s exhibit #560 A-J are marked and admitted into evidence, plaintiff’s exhibits #86, #87 are marked and admitted into evidence, cross examination by Mr. Cushing, re-direct examination by Ms. Sankiewicz, then is excused. TAMMY ROGERS-HAN, is called to the stand, sworn and testified on direct examination by Mr. Nersesian, cross examination by Mr. Cushing, re-direct examination by Mr. Nersesian, then is excused. The jury is admonished and excused at 4:45 p.m. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the civil jury trial in this matter shall continue to Tuesday, March 25, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Court adjourned at 4:50 p.m. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT BY: /S/ David Oakes, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?