Wilson v. Holder et al
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 9 Motion to Dismiss Individual-Capacity Claims. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Holder, Jones, and Herbert in their individual capacities are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CHARLES C. RAINEY
Rainey Devine, Attorneys at Law
2245 West Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 110
Henderson, Nevada 89052
chaz@raineydevine.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
ALICIA N. ELLINGTON
JOHN K. THEIS
Trial Attorneys, Federal Programs Branch
United States Department of Justice, Civil Division
20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Room 6701
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: (202) 305-7632
Facsimile: (202) 616-8460
John.K.Theis@usdoj.gov
Alicia.N.Ellington@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants United States; Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; and Eric Holder,
B. Todd Jones, and Arthur Herbert in their official capacities
ZACHARY RICHTER
Trial Attorney, Constitutional Torts Staff
United States Department of Justice, Civil Division
P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: (202) 616-4199
Facsimile: (202) 616-4314
Zachary.Richter@usdoj.gov
Attorney for Defendants Eric Holder, B. Todd Jones,
and Arthur Herbert in their individual capacities
18
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
22
S. ROWAN WILSON,
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
v.
ERIC HOLDER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) Case No.: 2:11-CV-1679-GMN-PAL
)
)
)
)
)
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
1
1
2
3
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties stipulate as
follows:
1.
Plaintiff has asserted claims against Attorney General Eric Holder, ATF Acting
4
Director B. Todd Jones, and ATF Assistant Director Arthur Herbert in both their individual and
5
official capacities.
6
2.
Having reviewed the individual defendants’ response to her Complaint, see ECF
7
No. 9, Plaintiff has decided not to pursue claims against Defendants Holder, Jones, and Herbert
8
in their individual capacities.
9
10
11
12
13
3.
Plaintiff will continue to pursue her remaining claims, including her claims
against Defendants Holder, Jones, and Herbert in their official capacities.
4.
Counsel for the parties have conferred, and no party objects to dismissal of
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Holder, Jones, and Herbert in their individual capacities.
Accordingly, the parties hereby give notice that that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants
14
Holder, Jones, and Herbert in their individual capacities are DISMISSED WITHOUT
15
PREJUDICE.
16
Dated: February 7, 2012
17
18
19
Attorney for Plaintiff
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Charles C. Rainey
CHARLES C. RAINEY
Rainey Devine, Attorneys at Law
2245 West Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 110
Henderson, Nevada 89052
chaz@raineydevine.com
Dated: February 7, 2012
/s/ Alicia N. Ellington
ALICIA N. ELLINGTON
JOHN K. THEIS
Trial Attorneys, Federal Programs Branch
United States Department of Justice, Civil Division
20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Room 6701
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: (202) 305-7632
Facsimile: (202) 616-8460
John.K.Theis@usdoj.gov
Alicia.N.Ellington@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants United States; Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; and
Eric Holder,B. Todd Jones, and Arthur Herbert in
their official capacities
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: February 7, 2012
/s/ Zachary Richter
ZACHARY RICHTER
Trial Attorney, Constitutional Torts Staff
United States Department of Justice, Civil Division
P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: (202) 616-4199
Facsimile: (202) 616-4314
Zachary.Richter@usdoj.gov
Attorney for Defendants Eric Holder, B. Todd
Jones, and Arthur Herbert in their individual
capacities
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2012.
11
12
________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?