Howard v. State Of Nevada et al
Filing
52
ORDER Granting 51 Plaintiff's Motion for a Copy of 47 Surreply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 01/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: a copy of 47 Surreply to Plaintiff - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
ABDUL HOWARD,
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
2:11-cv-01698-JAD-NJK
ORDER
16
This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 9,
17
2014, plaintiff filed a motion for a copy of his surreply, which has been stricken by the Court (Docket
18
No. 47). In his motion, plaintiff explains that he does not have access to a copy machine or law library.
19
Plaintiff therefore asks the court to send him a copy of the surreply he submitted in this action. Good
20
cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion is granted. The Clerk shall send to plaintiff one copy of his surreply
21
in this case, which may be found at Docket No. 47, at his address of record.
22
This is not Plaintiff’s first request for the Court to send him copies of his own filings.
23
See Docket No. 36 (order granting Plaintiff’s motion to send him a copy of his complaint). Although
24
the Court will provide a copy of this filing to Plaintiff this time, Plaintiff shall take steps in the future
25
to have a copy of his filings, whether it be by carbon paper, hand-writing a copy, or other means. The
26
Court may be less inclined to grant further similar requests in light of this instruction.
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a copy (Docket No. 51) is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send to plaintiff at his address of
record one copy of the document at Docket No. 47.
DATED this 13th day of January, 2014.
6
7
8
NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?