LaHood v. Avatar Tours, LLC et al

Filing 10

CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney ARTHUR R. GOLDBERG Assistant Branch Director MARSHA STELSON EDNEY Senior Trial Counsel United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington D.C. 20001 202-514-4520 Marsha.edney@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the Plaintiff 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 14 RAY LaHOOD, Secretary of Transportation, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 vs. AVATAR TOURS, LLC SEAN DELANEY II and BRENDEN DELANEY Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-01768 (JCMCWH) 22 23 24 CONSENT DECREE This Consent Decree is entered between Plaintiff Ray LaHood, Secretary of 25 Transportation (“the Secretary”) and Sean Delaney II, and Brenden Delaney and Avatar Tours, 26 LLC along with Avatar Tours, LLC’s owners, partners, shareholders, officers, and members, 27 (hereinafter “Avatar Tours” and with Sean Delaney II and Brenden Delaney “Defendants”) for 1 Case 2:11-cv-01768-JCM -CWH Document 9-1 Filed 12/16/11 Page 2 of 6 1 the purpose of resolving the issues raised between the Secretary and the Defendants in the above- 2 captioned case. The term “Parties” collectively refers to the Secretary and the Defendants. BACKGROUND 3 4 1. Interstate motor carrier transportation is regulated under Title 49, Subtitle IV, Part 5 B, of the United States Code. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 13501, the Secretary of Transportation has 6 authority over interstate motor carrier transportation of persons or property. In accordance with 7 49 U.S.C. § 113(f), the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) carries out the 8 powers and duties of the Secretary related to the regulation of interstate motor carrier 9 transportation. 10 2. Section 13901 of Title 49 of the United States Code provides that a for-hire motor 11 carrier may not operate over the public highways in interstate or foreign commerce unless the 12 motor carrier is granted and maintains operating authority registration with FMCSA. Similarly, 13 49 C.F.R. § 392.9a(a) provides that a motor vehicle providing transportation requiring operating 14 authority registration must not be operated without the required operating authority. 15 3. Section 13902 of Title 49 of the United States Code provides that a person may be 16 registered as a motor carrier if that person is able and willing to comply with the federal motor 17 carrier statute and accompanying regulations and certain minimum financial responsibility 18 requirements established under 49 U.S.C. § 13906. Such motor carriers must also meet the 19 safety fitness requirements under 49 U.S.C. § 31144. 20 4. Defendants operate as a for-hire motor carrier operating commercial motor 21 vehicles, as defined in 49 U.S.C. § 13102. Accordingly, Defendants are subject to the 22 requirements of federal motor carrier statutes, including 49 U.S.C. §§ 13901 and 13902, and 23 accompanying regulations, including 49 C.F.R. § 392.9a(a). 24 5. The Secretary has authority to make regulations regarding commercial motor 25 vehicle safety (49 U.S.C. § 31136), and minimum financial responsibility for transporting 26 passengers (49 U.S.C. § 31138), and may prescribe requirements for the safe operation and 27 equipment of motor carriers and motor private carriers (49 U.S.C. § 31502). The Secretary also 2 Case 2:11-cv-01768-JCM -CWH Document 9-1 Filed 12/16/11 Page 3 of 6 1 has authority to determine the safety fitness of an owner or operator of commercial motor 2 vehicles. (49 U.S.C. § 31144). 3 6. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 31144, the FMCSA promulgated regulations establishing 4 procedures to determine the safety fitness of motor carriers, and to implement the statutory 5 prohibitions on operations by a motor carrier after receiving a safety rating of “unsatisfactory”. 6 (49 C.F.R. Part 385). 7 7. Defendants are subject to the requirements of the federal motor carrier safety 8 statutes, including 49 U.S.C. §§ 31135, 31136 and 31144, and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 9 Regulations (“FMCSRs”) codified at 49 C.F.R. Parts 350-399. 10 8. The Secretary has brought the complaint against the Defendants pursuant to 49 11 U.S.C. §§ 507 and 14702 to enforce the requirements of 49 U.S.C. §§ 13901, 13902 and 31144, 12 and accompanying regulations, including 49 C.F.R. § 49 C.F.R. § 392.9a(a) and 385.13(a)(1). 13 The Secretary’s complaint alleged that following a compliance review of Defendants’ motor 14 carrier operations on July 7, 2011 Defendants’ received an unsatisfactory safety rating. Because 15 Defendants’ failed to take necessary actions to improve the safety rating, the unsatisfactory 16 safety rating became final and FMCSA ordered Defendants’ to cease motor carrier operations in 17 and affecting interstate commerce. FMCSA also revoked Defendants’ operating authority 18 registration. The unsatisfactory safety rating, Order to Cease and revocation of Defendants’ 19 operating authority became effective August 28, 2011, and remain in effect. The Secretary’s 20 complaint further alleges that the Defendants have operated commercial motor vehicles 21 transporting passengers in interstate commerce without having the required operating authority 22 registration from FMCSA and in violation an FMCSA Order to Cease and the prohibitions 23 associated with its final unsatisfactory safety rating. The Secretary seeks declaratory and 24 injunctive relief to prevent the Defendants from engaging in interstate motor carrier 25 transportation operations without current, valid operating authority registration in their current 26 business name or in any other name or identification, and unless and until Defendants have taken 27 necessary corrective actions and received a conditional or satisfactory safety rating from 3 Case 2:11-cv-01768-JCM -CWH Document 9-1 1 FMCSA. 2 9. Filed 12/16/11 Page 4 of 6 3 4 5 The Parties have agreed to enter this Consent Decree to resolve the issues raised by the Secretary’s complaint without further litigation. 10. The Secretary represents that this Consent Decree serves the public interest purposes of Title 49, Subtitle IV, Part B, of the United States Code. 6 CONSENT DECREE 7 It is therefore agreed, by and between the parties, as follows: 8 1. Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and persons 9 with whom they are in active concert or participation are required to comply fully with 10 11 FMCSA’s Order to Cease and are enjoined from operating any commercial 12 motor vehicle in or affecting interstate commerce unless and until the order is rescinded by 13 FMCSA. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and persons with whom they are in active concert or participation, are enjoined from operating any commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce that requires operating authority registration in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 13901 unless and until Defendants’ obtain obtain valid operating authority from FMCSA. Defendants are further enjoined from contracting with or arranging for additional transportation of passengers unless the contracted motor carrier possesses any required operating authority registration from FMCSA. 2. Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and persons with whom they are in active concert or participation, are enjoined from applying to FMCSA for a new or renstated/reactivated USDOT Number other than USDOT No. 2038766 and/or new or reinstated operating authority registration except under USDOT No.2038766. 3. Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and persons with whom they are in active concert or participation, are enjoined from applying to FMCSA for 27 4 Case 2:11-cv-01768-JCM -CWH Document 9-1 Filed 12/16/11 Page 5 of 6 1 operating authority registration unless such application accurately discloses any and all 2 affiliations with any other business or entity regulated by the Secretary, as required by the 3 FMCSA’s application form. 4. 4 Defendants , their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and 5 persons with whom they are in active concert or participation are enjoined from knowingly 6 assisting and/or aiding other persons or motor carriers from operating without the requisite 7 operating authority registration and/or in violation of federal motor carrier statute and regulations 8 and FMCSA orders. 5. 9 This Consent Decree resolves only the Secretary’s claims for declaratory or 10 injunctive relief in the above-captioned action and is without prejudice to any rights the 11 Secretary has against Defendants with respect to matters not expressly provided for herein. This 12 Consent Decree does not resolve any other past, present, or future disputes between the Parties, 13 including but not limited to proceedings for civil penalties for violations of federal motor carrier 14 statues and regulations, and does not restrict the Secretary from taking any future action pursuant 15 to his lawful authority to enforce federal motor carrier statutes and regulations. 6. This Consent Decree is binding upon the Parties as of the date it is signed by the 18 7. This Consent Decree becomes an Order of the Court on the date it is approved. 19 8. If any provision of this Consent Decree is determined to be invalid or 16 17 Parties. 20 unenforceable for any reason, then such provision shall be treated as severed from the remainder 21 of the Consent Decree and shall not affect the validity and enforceability of all of its other 22 provisions, as long as such severance does not materially change the Parties’ rights and 23 obligations. 24 25 26 9. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the terms of this Consent Decree. 10. Each of the Parties to this Consent Decree shall bear its/his own fees and costs. 27 5 December 23, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?